Analysis of Abnormal Level Conversion in STM32 Simulated SPI: A Comprehensive Solution from 2V Mysterious Voltage to Waveform Distortion

Recently, while using the IO ports of STM32 for simulated SPI communication, I encountered a strange phenomenon:

  • Normal Condition: 3.3V push-pull output, waveform is perfect

  • Abnormal Condition: 3.3V to 1.8V, push-pull output with a 4.7K pull-up, SPI timing waveform distortion, data writing is abnormal

Only after increasing the delay can the waveform return to normal! Moreover, the measured voltage is 2V instead of 1.8V. What principle is hidden behind this?The Origin of the Mysterious Voltage: Why is it 2V instead of 1.8V?Analysis of Abnormal Level Conversion in STM32 Simulated SPI: A Comprehensive Solution from 2V Mysterious Voltage to Waveform DistortionRoot Cause of the Problem: The voltage divider effect of internal pull-up and external pull-up resistorsWhen the internal pull-up is enabled, the internal pull-up resistor of the MCU (usually 30-50kΩ) is connected to the 3.3V power supply. Even when set to open-drain output mode, the internal pull-up resistor still operates, forming a resistor divider network with the external 1.8V pull-up, causing the actual measured voltage to rise to about 2.0V.

Solution

When using an external pull-up resistor, the GPIO should be set to<span><span>GPIO_PuPd_NOPULL</span></span> mode to avoid the internal pull-up affecting the voltage level. If reliable level conversion is required, it is best to use a dedicated level conversion chip.Analysis of Abnormal Level Conversion in STM32 Simulated SPI: A Comprehensive Solution from 2V Mysterious Voltage to Waveform DistortionWaveform Distortion Mystery: Why is the OD mode slow to rise?

Root Cause: The contradiction between pull-up resistor value and rise time

The external 4.7K pull-up resistor is relatively large, leading to a longer rise time, which cannot meet the timing requirements of SPI communication. SPI communication has strict timing requirements, and a slow rising edge can cause data instability at the sampling time point.

Comparison of Solutions:

Solution Applicable Scenario Cost Performance
Open-Drain Output Medium to Low-Speed Communication Low Good
Delay Compensation Temporary Debugging None Poor
Reduce Pull-Up Resistor Low Power Requirement Not High Low Average
Level Conversion Chip High-Speed Communication Medium to High Excellent

// Increase delay compensation rise timevoid SPI_Delay(void){    for(int i = 0; i &lt; 5; i++);  // Adjust delay value}

🎯 Key Takeaways

  1. Push-pull output + external pull-up = voltage conflict ⚠️

  2. Open-drain output is the correct way for level conversion

  3. Pull-up resistor value affects rise time 📈

  4. In high-speed scenarios, it is recommended to use dedicated level conversion chips 🚀

Remember: When level conversion is needed, always disable the internal pull-up resistor and choose the appropriate pull-up resistor or level conversion chip based on speed requirements!

Be sure to bookmark this article, so you won’t be confused when encountering level conversion issues next time!

Leave a Comment