Research on Domain Controller Technology Framework

Research on Domain Controller Technology Framework

1. Core Definition and Industry Background of Domain Controllers

  1. Background of Technological Evolution

  • Pain points of traditional distributed architecture: Each functional module is independently equipped with an ECU (such as engine control, brake control), leading to a surge in the number of ECUs (over 60 in luxury models in 2018), high system complexity, high development costs, and difficulties in fault diagnosis.
  • Birth of the domain controller: Integrating multiple functional modules into a unified controller to achieve data sharing and system integration, enhancing computing power utilization. Currently, the mainstream is divided into three domains: intelligent driving, cockpit, and body, evolving towards a centralized architecture in the future.
  • Architecture and Industry Chain

    • Hardware LayerComposed of communication units (CANFD/LVDS/Ethernet), computing units (SoC+MCU heterogeneous design), and storage units (DDR/UFS). SoC has become the core due to high computing power requirements (e.g., L5 level requires 4000 TOPS computing power).
    • Software LayerSystem software (kernel/virtual machine), middleware (AUTOSAR AP/CP), functional software (algorithms/OTA), application software (human-machine interaction/navigation) in a layered architecture, with the software value proportion expected to increase from 10% in 2024 to 30% in 2030.
    • Industry ChainUpstream chip manufacturers (NVIDIA, Qualcomm), midstream integrators (Desay SV, Jingwei Hirain), downstream OEMs (Tesla, BYD), with cooperation models mainly based on Tier 1 white box/gray box delivery.

    2. Intelligent Driving Domain Controller: Core Engine for Advanced Autonomous Driving

    1. Market Size and Penetration Rate

    • Global MarketIn 2022, the market size was 16.5 billion yuan, with a CAGR of 211.2% from 2019 to 2022, expected to reach 115.4 billion yuan by 2026, with a penetration rate of 62.7% by 2030.
    • Chinese MarketIn 2022, the market size was 9.8 billion yuan, with a CAGR of 341% from 2019 to 2022, expected to reach 64.5 billion yuan by 2026, with a penetration rate of 72.8% by 2030.
    • ADAS Penetration RateIn 2024, the penetration rates for L2/L2++ are expected to be 36.8%/7.3%, with L2.5/L2.9 accelerating penetration due to the embedding of LiDAR, with a 23.4% installation rate for new L2.9 models launched in 2024.
  • Technical Requirements and Competitive Landscape

    • Computing Power RequirementsL2 requires less than 10 TOPS, while L4 requires more than 200 TOPS, driving SoC towards high computing power (e.g., NVIDIA Orin-X 254 TOPS) and advanced processes (5nm/4nm).
    • Market ShareIn Q1 2025, the installation volumes are expected to be led by Desay SV (27.8%), BYD (18.7%), and Pegatron/Quanta (15.0%), with NVIDIA (39.5%) and Tesla (21.5%) dominating the chip side.
    • Typical SolutionsTesla FSD V12 achieves end-to-end autonomous driving, Xiaopeng XNet perception model supports integrated driving and parking, Huawei ADS 3.0 optimizes environmental perception with GOD network.

    3. Intelligent Cockpit Domain Controller: Core Carrier for Human-Machine Interaction Upgrade

    1. Market Growth and Penetration Rate

    • Global MarketIn 2024, the market size is expected to reach 366.8 billion yuan, with an expected 429.6 billion yuan in 2025, and a CAGR of 18.7% from 2019 to 2025.
    • Chinese MarketIn 2024, the market size is expected to reach 129 billion yuan, with an expected 156.4 billion yuan in 2025, and a penetration rate increasing from 51% in 2022 to 73% in 2024, with an expected 80% in 2025.
    • Segmented ScenariosIn 2022, the cockpit domain controller installation rate for vehicles priced at 300,000-350,000 yuan reached 34%, with lower-cost models (150,000-200,000 yuan) accelerating penetration due to cost reductions.
  • Technical Trends and Competitive Landscape

    • Architecture UpgradeTransitioning from “one chip one function” to “one chip multiple screens,” supporting dual-system isolation of QNX (safety domain) + Android (entertainment domain), such as Qualcomm SA8155 supporting multi-screen interaction.
    • Chip CompetitionIn Q1 2025, Qualcomm is expected to dominate with a 75.2% share, while Huawei (4.3%) and Chipone Technology (4.2%) accelerate domestic substitution, with the embedded cost of cockpit chips accounting for about 1,500 yuan per vehicle.
    • Interaction InnovationIntegrating voice recognition (iFlytek), gesture control, AR-HUD (HuaYang Group), with cockpit software value proportion expected to exceed 50% by 2025.

    4. Domain Controller Hardware Architecture: In-Depth Analysis of SoC and Heterogeneous Computing

    1. Subdivision of Hardware Units

    • Communication UnitLow-speed communication (CANFD/LIN for radar), high-speed communication (Ethernet for LiDAR/high-precision maps), supporting transmission rates above 10 Gbps.
    • Computing UnitSoC (GPU/AI unit processing perception algorithms) + MCU (real-time control of chassis/brakes), such as NVIDIA Orin-X containing 12 ARM Cortex-A78AE cores.
    • Storage UnitDDR4/DDR5 (operating memory) + UFS (data storage), with L4 level requiring TB-level storage bandwidth.
  • Chip Technology Iteration

    • Cockpit ChipsQualcomm 8295 (7nm) supports 6-screen linkage, while domestic chip manufacturer Chipone X9H (8nm) enters models priced below 150,000 yuan.
    • Intelligent Driving ChipsNVIDIA Thor (4nm, 2000 TOPS), Tesla’s self-developed 3nm chip, and Horizon Robotics’ Journey 6 (7nm, 200 TOPS) expected to be mass-produced in 2024.

    5. Domain Controller Software Architecture: Loose Coupling and Value Layering

    1. System Software Layer

    • Kernel Monopoly PatternQNX occupies 90% of the vehicle control OS market share, while Linux/Android dominate the cockpit OS, with domestic Huawei Harmony and Zhongke Chuangda’s Drip Water OS accelerating adaptation.
    • Virtual Machine TechnologyHypervisor achieves isolation between safety and non-safety domains, such as QNX Hypervisor supporting parallel multi-system in the cockpit.
  • Middleware and Functional Software

    • AlgorithmsEnd-to-end neural networks replace traditional modular architecture, with Tesla FSD achieving “camera → steering” direct control through 100 EFLOPS computing power training.
    • OTATesla achieves software subscription revenue through FOTA, with global OTA sales expected to reach 14.94 billion USD by 2031, while domestic Xiaopeng and NIO iterate more than 12 times annually.
    • Middleware StandardsAUTOSAR CP (for traditional ECUs) and AP (for autonomous driving) differentiation, with AP supporting C++ language and SOA architecture, with a global market size expected to reach 15.6 billion USD by 2030.

    6. Core Targets and Business Layout of the Industry Chain

    1. Domain Controller Integrators

    • Desay SVIn 2024, intelligent cockpit revenue is expected to reach 18.23 billion yuan (66% share), with intelligent driving domain control supporting Li Auto and BYD, and Orin-X installation volume expected to rank first in Q1 2025.
    • Jingwei HirainAutomotive-grade middleware (AUTOSAR AP) adapted for NIO and Dongfeng, with R&D investment of 1.039 billion yuan in 2024 (18.8% of revenue).
    • Joyson ElectronicsIntelligent driving domain control supporting Volkswagen and BMW, with automotive electronics revenue expected to reach 16.599 billion yuan in 2024, with a gross margin of 16%.
  • Software and Algorithm Vendors

    • Guangting InformationADAS algorithms adapted for Qualcomm/Horizon platforms, with a net profit of 30 million yuan in 2024 (year-on-year +292.87%).
  • Chip and Hardware Suppliers

    • HuaweiAscend 610 chip (200 TOPS) supporting Arcfox and Wenjie, with a market share of 7.8% in intelligent driving chips in Q1 2025.
    • Wanjie TechnologyLiDAR (VT60 series) supporting Yutong and Xiaopeng, with roadside equipment revenue expected to exceed 30% in 2024.

    7. Summary of Future Trends

    • Hardware IntegrationIntelligent driving/cockpit domain control is evolving towards a central computing platform, with a single SoC expected to integrate vehicle control/cockpit/network functions by 2028.
    • Software-Defined ValueAutomakers are achieving secondary revenue through OTA subscriptions (e.g., Tesla FSD monthly fee of 199 USD), with software revenue potentially accounting for 30% of the entire vehicle by 2030.
    • Domestic Substitution PathSoC (Horizon, Huawei), OS (Harmony), and middleware (Neusoft Ruichi) are gradually breaking through from cockpit to intelligent driving.

    Research on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology FrameworkResearch on Domain Controller Technology Framework

    Research on Domain Controller Technology Framework

    Leave a Comment