Why ARM Architecture Remains Resilient: How to Replace It?

Despite the encroachment of processor architectures like x86 and RISC-V, ARM has experienced counter-cyclical growth—over 30 billion ARM chips shipped globally in 2023, dominating 95% of the mobile market. It can be said that ARM remains resilient, but what is the reason behind this?

Why ARM Architecture Remains Resilient: How to Replace It?

1. Absolute Notification of Energy Efficiency Ratio

① Performance per watt crushes x86

Data comparison:

ARM Cortex-X3: 5.6 SPECint/mW

Intel i9-13900K: 0.8 SPECint/mW

The gap is 7 times (at the same process node)

② Ingenious microarchitecture design

Pipeline optimization:

Short pipeline (8-15 stages vs. x86’s 20+ stages) reduces branch prediction penalties

Dynamic Voltage Frequency Scaling (DVFS) accuracy reaches 1MHz/1mV

③ Process adaptation advantages

Compatible across all nodes from 40nm to 3nm (Intel is still stuck below 10nm)

2. Scenario-based Customization Capability

Why ARM Architecture Remains Resilient: How to Replace It?

3. Commercial Barriers of Licensing Models

① Three-tier licensing system

Architecture licensing (e.g., Apple’s self-developed microarchitecture)

Core licensing (e.g., Qualcomm’s Kryo CPU)

Chip licensing (e.g., STM32 directly using Cortex-M)

② Cost advantages

x86 development cost: $500M+ (requires building a wafer fab)

ARM development cost: $50M (Fabless model + IP reuse)

4. Software Ecosystem as a Moat

① Dominance in mobile

Android system has 100% native support for ARM

Apple’s iOS ecosystem is fully tied to ARM

② Developer toolchain

ARM Compiler 6 has 15% higher compilation efficiency than GCC

DS-5 debugger supports cache coherence analysis

This article is an original piece by Wanyi Education, please indicate the source when reprinting!

Leave a Comment