Understanding PLC Selection: Comparison of Mainstream Brands/Series + Beginner’s Pitfall Guide

Faced with the dazzling array of PLC brands in the market (Mitsubishi, Siemens, Omron…), how should beginners choose? Today, using real factory cases for comparison, I will teach you the 3 steps to select the most suitable PLC!

1. Core Differences Among Mainstream Brands

Brand

Features

Typical User Profile

Representative Models

Mitsubishi

Japanese representative, strong stability, simple programming

Electricians, automation equipment manufacturers

FX3U (small), Q series (medium to large)

Siemens

German precision, powerful functions, complete ecosystem

Automotive factories, high-end equipment companies

S7-200 SMART (small), S7-1200 (medium)

Omron

High cost-performance ratio, rich Japanese-style instructions

Small machinery factories, university laboratories

CP1E (micro), NJ series (high-end)

Schneider

European brand, good compatibility

Energy industry, rail transportation

M241 (economical), Modicon M580 (high-end)

AB

American representative, suitable for complex systems

Large factories, aerospace

Micro800 (small), ControlLogix (large)

2. Key Parameters Determine Selection Direction

1. Number of IO Points

Small PLC: <256 points (suitable for single machine control, such as vending machines)

Medium PLC: 256~1024 points (suitable for production lines, such as automotive welding lines)

Large PLC: >1024 points (suitable for plant-wide control, such as chemical DCS systems)

Beginner’s Pitfall: Choosing too small is insufficient, choosing too large wastes budget

Solution: Reserve 1.5 times the actual demand for expansion space

2. Programming Language Support

Language

Mitsubishi Support

Siemens Support

Omron Support

LD

SFC

✅ (SCL)

Structured Text

✅ (SCL)

Recommendation: Prioritize selecting PLCs that support LD (90% of electricians can directly use it)

3. Communication Capability

Basic Requirement: RS485/Modbus (connect to inverters, instruments)

Advanced Requirement: Ethernet/IP, Profibus (connect to robots, upper computers)

Case Study: A food factory needs to connect weighing sensors (Modbus) and MES systems (Ethernet), so they chose a PLC with dual communication ports

3 Major Series Comparisons Every Beginner Should See

1. Mitsubishi FX3U vs Siemens S7-200 SMART

Comparison Item

FX3U

S7-200 SMART

Price

About 1500 RMB

About 2000 RMB

Max IO

256 points (requires expansion)

60 points base + expansion

Programming Software

GX Works2 (free)

TIA Portal (requires license)

Advantages

Japanese instructions are closer to Asian habits

Seamless integration with Siemens inverters

Applicable Scenarios

Small to medium devices (e.g., injection molding machines, packaging machines)

Factories with existing Siemens equipment (e.g., textile factories)

2. Omron CP1E vs Schneider M241

Comparison Item

CP1E

M241

Size

Ultra-micro (suitable for tight spaces)

Compact design

Analog Quantity

Built-in 2 channels AD/DA

Requires expansion module

Programming

CX-Programmer (simple)

SoMachine (powerful)

Applicable Scenarios

University laboratories, small projects (e.g., automatic door control)

Projects requiring connection to third-party devices (e.g., communication with ABB robots)

3. Mitsubishi Q Series vs Siemens S7-1500

Comparison Item

Q Series

S7-1500

Processing Speed

0.034μs/instruction

0.002μs/instruction

Expansion Capability

Supports 1000+ IO points

Supports 65536 points

Price

Starting from about 8000 RMB

Starting from about 12000 RMB

Applicable Scenarios

Automotive production lines, semiconductor equipment

Large factories, rail transportation

4. Pitfall Guide: 5 Common Mistakes for Beginners

1. Blindly Pursuing the “Latest Model”

– Case: A factory chose a newly released PLC, only to find no compatible expansion modules available

– Recommendation: Choose mature models that have been on the market for over 2 years (e.g., FX3U, S7-200 SMART)

2. Ignoring Programming Software Costs

– Siemens TIA Portal professional version license fee exceeds 100,000 RMB, use caution for small projects

– Alternative: Choose brands that support free programming software (Mitsubishi, Omron)

3. Underestimating Communication Compatibility

– Case: Chose a PLC that does not support Modbus, unable to connect to existing instruments

– Solution: Confirm the required communication protocols for the project in advance (e.g., Modbus RTU/ASCII)

4. Only Looking at Base Price Without Considering Expansion Costs

– A certain brand has a cheap base unit, but each analog module costs 2000 RMB

– Calculation Method: Base price + Module price × Quantity needed

5. Choosing the Wrong Programming Language

– Case: Chose a PLC that only supports ST language, resulting in the electrician team being unable to maintain it

– Principle: Prioritize selecting PLCs that support LD (unless the team has an IT background)

5. 3 Steps to Select the Most Suitable PLC

Step 1: Clarify Project Requirements

Control Objects: Number of motors? Types of sensors?

Complexity: Is PID control needed? Multi-axis linkage?

Expandability: Will additional devices be needed in the next 3 years?

Step 2: Filter by Budget

Small Projects (<10,000 RMB): FX3U, CP1E, M241

Medium Projects (10,000-50,000 RMB): S7-1200, Q series basic model

Large Projects (>50,000 RMB): S7-1500, AB ControlLogix

Step 3: Verify Feasibility

Download the official manual to confirm if the required functions are supported

Search forums for “brand + model + issue” (e.g., “FX3U PID debugging experience”)

Consult suppliers to see if they can provide technical support

6. Summary: Best Choices for Different Scenarios

✅ Beginner Entry: Mitsubishi FX3U (plenty of resources, easy to use)

✅ University Laboratories: Omron CP1E (high cost-performance ratio)

✅ Automotive Factories: Siemens S7-1200 (compatible with Siemens equipment)

✅ Wastewater Treatment: Schneider M241 (supports multiple communication protocols)

✅ High-end Manufacturing: Mitsubishi Q Series (high-speed processing + rich modules)

Follow our public account for more resources

What PLCs have you used in your projects? Which brand has been the most reliable for you? Share your experiences in the comments!

Leave a Comment