The United States has suddenly lifted restrictions on chip exports to China, and the Chinese side has responded positively, welcoming cooperation. This article reveals the economic game behind this decision, analyzing opportunities for businesses and benefits for consumers, helping you understand the new dynamics of Sino-US trade.
01
Incident Erupts: US Lifting Chip Controls Draws Global Attention
On June 27, 2025, the US Department of Commerce announced the complete removal of chip export controls to China, a decision that shook the international market like thunder. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs quickly responded, emphasizing that this is a positive signal for promoting bilateral trade cooperation and calling on the US to continue implementing fair policies. Imagine, as an ordinary consumer, the prices of your smartphones, computers, and other electronic devices may decrease as a result, but behind this lies decades of economic games between China and the US. The incident stems from long-standing pressure from the US business community: giants like Qualcomm and Intel have suffered heavy losses due to the loss of the Chinese market, with data showing that US chip exports are expected to plummet by 30% in 2024, forcing the Biden administration to adjust its strategy. The Chinese response appears simple but is laden with deep meaning: we are shifting from passive defense to proactive cooperation, injecting new momentum into the stability of the global supply chain.
02
The Deeper Meaning of China’s Response: The Wisdom of Win-Win Cooperation
The Chinese response is not an empty slogan but a precise strategic layout. A spokesperson for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs pointed out that this move will ‘promote mutually beneficial cooperation in high-tech fields,’ subtly revealing China’s breakthroughs in self-developed chips: Huawei’s Kirin chips have achieved mass production at 7nm, no longer fully reliant on imports. The underlying reason for the US lifting restrictions is economic self-rescue: the global chip shortage has led to price increases for products like the iPhone, causing consumer complaints; at the same time, China, as the largest semiconductor market, is expected to import over $500 billion in 2024, and if US companies are absent, they will miss out on recovery opportunities. By responding with an open posture, China not only alleviates the anxiety of domestic companies like SMIC but also sends a pragmatic signal of ‘de-risking’ to the world. In this game, China cleverly utilizes its technological advantages to turn pressure into opportunity.
03
Actual Impact: Corporate Cheers and Consumer Benefits Trigger a Chain Reaction
The incident directly affects the corporate ecosystem and daily life. Chinese tech giants like Xiaomi and BYD saw their stock prices rise by 10%, and supply chain costs are expected to decrease by 15%, meaning your next smartphone could be hundreds of yuan cheaper. But don’t cheer too soon: analysis shows that small and medium-sized enterprises face new challenges: the influx of imported chips may squeeze local innovation. Huawei engineer Wang Ming candidly stated, ‘While price wars are good, core technology is the lifeblood.’ On the consumer side, e-commerce platforms indicate that inventories of smartphones, cars, and other electronic products are increasing, and prices are expected to drop further after the 618 shopping festival. However, deep-seated risks remain: US policies are capricious; after similar cancellation measures in 2023, restrictions were reimposed just three months later. Can this time be sustained? China urges the US through dialogue mechanisms to keep its promises and ensure that the benefits reach the public.
04
Future Outlook: A New Chapter in Sino-US Relations and National Reflection
Looking ahead, the incident suggests a period of easing in Sino-US trade. Experts predict that if cooperation continues, the global chip market will grow by 20% by 2026, accelerating the implementation of China’s Manufacturing 2025 plan. However, China reminds us that the specter of unilateralism has not dissipated: while the US lifts restrictions, it continues to exert pressure in other areas, such as AI technology barriers. A moment of national reflection is upon us: should we blindly rely on imports? The Chinese chip industry, after a decade of hard work, has transformed from a follower into a rule-maker. As we conclude, let me ask: in this interconnected era, every policy change affects our wallets; shouldn’t we cherish the benefits brought by cooperation rather than fall into the trap of zero-sum games?
Author: Seven Seconds Fish Editor: Qingyang
Seven Seconds Fish says scan to follow for the latest news!
Your ‘likes’ and ‘recommendations’ are our motivation to move forward!