1. Introduction: A Technological Leap from AI Illusions to Physical Intuition
Throughout the evolution of human civilization, technological revolutions often reshape social structures in unexpected ways. As generative AI like ChatGPT demonstrates astonishing capabilities in artistic creation, a profound paradox emerges: while humanity expects AI to liberate physical labor, we first witness its breakthroughs in creative fields. This phenomenon reflects the core dilemma in the development of robotics—the interaction capabilities with the physical world remain the greatest shortcoming of artificial intelligence. Just as the movement intuition developed over millions of years of human evolution is difficult to replicate with algorithms, the understanding and manipulation of the physical environment by robots has always been a bottleneck limiting their large-scale application.
However, this situation is undergoing a fundamental transformation. The ASAP (Aligning Simulation and Real Physics) model released by NVIDIA in 2025 uses dynamic calibration technology to reduce the error between simulation environments and the real physical world to millimeter levels, enabling the Yushun G1 robot to accurately mimic Cristiano Ronaldo’s kicking actions, achieving a fluidity of movement comparable to that of professional athletes. The Tesla Optimus robot has completed screw fastening operations in 0.7 seconds, far exceeding human workers in speed. More critically, China’s absolute advantage in core robotic components (such as a market share of over 45% in servo motors) provides an industrial foundation for technological breakthroughs. These advancements signify that robotics technology is on the brink of an explosion—once the physics engine achieves a qualitative leap, the large-scale replacement of blue-collar jobs will become irreversible.
2. Breakthroughs in Physics Engines: The Critical Point of Robotic Capability Leap
2.1 Bridging the Gap Between Simulation and Reality
Traditional robot training relies on expensive physical experiments, while the ASAP model employs a closed-loop training method of “real → simulation → real,” redirecting action data to the simulation environment and compensating for dynamic differences through delta action models. This approach allows the Yushun G1 robot to accurately mimic Cristiano Ronaldo’s kicking actions, achieving a fluidity of movement comparable to that of professional athletes. NVIDIA’s Isaac GR00T N1 model further integrates physical AI, enabling robots to understand the physical properties of objects (such as weight and friction coefficients), thus completing complex operations. This model adopts a dual-system architecture, where “System 1” quickly executes intuitive actions, and “System 2” conducts deep reasoning through visual language models, significantly enhancing the robot’s adaptability to the environment.
2.2 Co-evolution of Hardware and Algorithms
The 22-degree-of-freedom bionic hand of Tesla’s Optimus combines the visual perception capabilities of FSD autonomous driving technology, achieving seamless integration of object grasping and path planning in factory environments. Boston Dynamics’ Handle robot, on the other hand, completes actions such as jumping and transporting in warehouse scenarios through a hydraulic drive system, improving efficiency by three times compared to humans. These breakthroughs rely on the deep integration of high power density motors (with China accounting for 45% of global production capacity) and reinforcement learning algorithms. The Tesla Optimus Gen3 uses self-developed actuators, achieving a 40% increase in joint torque density, and the sensor fusion scheme (visual + tactile) achieves millimeter-level operational precision, with a success rate of over 95% in battery cell classification tasks.
2.3 Steep Decline in Cost Curves
Over the past decade, the cost of industrial robots has decreased by 27%, and it is expected to drop another 22% by 2025. Tesla plans to control the production cost of Optimus to under $20,000, which is only one-third of the five-year salary of a human worker. This cost advantage makes robots far more economical than human labor in scenarios such as welding and assembly, directly accelerating the replacement process. Bank of America predicts that in the next decade, robots will take over 45% of jobs in manufacturing, reducing labor costs by $9 trillion.
3. The Logic Reconstruction of Blue-Collar Replacement: From Efficiency Revolution to Industrial Disruption
3.1 The Codability Characteristics of Blue-Collar Work
The essence of blue-collar work is characterized by “clear objectives, defined boundaries, and high repetition” in physical operations. For example, tasks such as a chef controlling the heat while cooking or an assembly worker fastening screws can be transformed into robot instructions through video capture and 3D modeling. This codability allows robots to quickly master skills by “watching videos” and even expand capabilities through skill package apps. NVIDIA’s Isaac GR00T Blueprint can generate 780,000 synthetic trajectories in 11 hours, equivalent to 6,500 hours of human demonstration data, significantly enhancing robot training efficiency.
3.2 The Explosive Characteristics of the Replacement Process
Unlike the gradual replacement of white-collar jobs, the replacement of blue-collar positions by robots will exhibit exponential growth. Once the physics engine breaks through the threshold, robots can replicate millions of standardized operations in a short time. Bank of America predicts that in the next decade, robots will take over 45% of jobs in manufacturing, reducing labor costs by $9 trillion. This speed of replacement far exceeds that of traditional automation equipment, as robots can not only perform single tasks but also quickly adapt to new scenarios through software upgrades. For instance, the UBTECH Walker S robot has already achieved tasks such as door lock quality inspection and seat belt detection in the NIO factory, with a replacement rate of 30%.
3.3 The Chain Reaction of Industrial Ecology
The replacement of robots will trigger a complete restructuring of the manufacturing industry chain. Taking the automotive assembly process as an example, the UBTECH Walker S robot has already achieved tasks such as door lock quality inspection and seat belt detection in the NIO factory, with a replacement rate of 30%. This replacement compels companies to invest in intelligent transformation, forming a closed loop of “robot procurement → data feedback → algorithm optimization.” The more profound impact is that the proliferation of robots will reshape the global industrial chain layout—labor cost advantages will no longer be the core factor for manufacturing site selection, while the integrity of the technological ecosystem and component supply chain will become key.
4. China’s Opportunities and Challenges: Strategic Choices Under Component Advantages
4.1 Core Positioning in the Industrial Chain
China’s advantages in the field of robotic components are irreplaceable. The global market shares of key components such as servo motors, reducers, and rare earth permanent magnets reach 45%, 40%, and 70%, respectively. This advantage stems from decades of industrial accumulation and policy support; for example, Shenzhen has gathered over 6,400 robotic hardware companies, forming a complete ecosystem from sensors to actuators. In the core components of Tesla’s Optimus, 60% to 70% come from Chinese suppliers, and this dependency is unlikely to change in the short term.
4.2 Strategic Window for Technological Leap
Although China lags behind the United States in robot training and mass production, its component advantages provide a unique strategic opportunity. Tesla’s “one-on-one training” model requires massive action data and hardware iteration capabilities, while Chinese companies can attract global developers by opening up the component supply chain, forming a “hardware + data” synergy. For example, Yushun Technology has reduced the price of the G1 robot to 99,000 yuan, lowering costs through mass production while collecting user data to optimize algorithms. China’s dominant position in the rare earth permanent magnet field (70% of global production capacity) further consolidates its voice in the robotics industry chain.
4.3 Adaptive Reforms in Policy and Education
Currently, some regions in China still implement junior high school diversion policies, attempting to cultivate industrial workers, a practice that has severely lagged behind technological trends. The manufacturing industry’s capacity to absorb employment is declining at a rate of 3% to 5% per year, while robot replacement will accelerate this process. Policies should shift to support the transformation of vocational education; for example, Shenzhen Vocational and Technical College has established a “robot operation and maintenance engineer” program to cultivate compound talents for human-machine collaboration. At the same time, a social security system should be established to address potential structural unemployment, such as by adopting the IMF’s recommendations for a “robot tax” and lifelong skills training programs.
5. Conclusion and Outlook: The Leap from a Manufacturing Power to a Robotics Power
The explosive development of robotics technology is rewriting the global industrial competitive landscape. Once the physics engine breaks through the threshold, the replacement of blue-collar jobs will become an irreversible trend, and China, with its component advantages, is at the core of this revolution. In the next decade, China needs to focus on the following three areas:
1. Building a Technological Ecosystem: Drawing on NVIDIA’s open-source strategy, establish foundational models and simulation platforms for robotics, attracting global developers to co-build the ecosystem. For example, Shenzhen can leverage its 6,400 hardware companies to create an innovative model of “hardware open-source + algorithm crowdsourcing.”
2. Breakthroughs in Scene Implementation: Achieve large-scale applications of robots in scenarios such as automotive manufacturing and logistics warehousing, optimizing technology through data feedback. UBTECH’s training in the Zeekr factory shows that multi-robot collaborative operations can improve production efficiency by over 20%.
3. Innovation in Policy Systems: Establish a special fund for the robotics industry to support core technological breakthroughs; reform the education system to cultivate “human-machine collaboration” talents; explore mechanisms such as “robot taxes” and social security to mitigate employment shocks.
This revolution is not only a competition of technology but also a contest of strategic vision. If China can seize the historical opportunity of breakthroughs in physics engines and transform from a component supplier to a standard setter, it is expected to reshape the global manufacturing landscape in the era of robotics. Just as Tesla opens the era of mass production with Optimus, Chinese enterprises must also invest in technological research and development with a “gamble” spirit to gain the upper hand in this competition that concerns the fate of the nation.
References
1. Fan, J., et al. (2025). ASAP: Aligning Simulation and Real-World Physics for Learning Agile Humanoid Whole-Body Skills. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 41(2), 345-360. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2025.3421872
2. International Federation of Robotics. (2025). World Robotics Report 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38075-0
3. Bank of America. (2025). The Robotics Revolution: Implications for Global Labor Markets. https://www.bankofamerica.com/research
4. Huang, J. (2025). Physical AI: The Next Frontier in Robotics. Nature Machine Intelligence, 7(4), 312-315. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-025-00768-9
5. International Monetary Fund. (2024). The Fiscal Role in Shaping AI-Driven Transitions. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2024/06/18/The-Fiscal-Role-in-Shaping-AI-Driven-Transitions-53206
6. Tesla. (2025). Optimus Technical Whitepaper. https://www.tesla.com/optimus
7. NVIDIA. (2025). Isaac GR00T N1: A Foundation Model for General-Purpose Humanoid Robotics. https://blogs.nvidia.cn/blog/nvidia-isaac-gr00t-n1-open-humanoid-robot-foundation-model-simulation-frameworks/
8. 中国电子报. (2025). 机器人:多技术融合与跨界合作将成新常态. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-025-2234-5
9. 中商情报网. (2025). 2025年中国伺服系统市场规模及竞争格局预测分析. https://www.askci.com/news/chanye/20250108/091016273629861663354571.shtml
10. 中华工控网. (2025). 2025-2030中国机器人产业透视:核心部件国产化率、场景落地与全球份额博弈. https://m.gkong.com/news/121406.html