In today’s explosion of smart devices, IoT cards have become a “standard configuration” for many enterprises. From shared bicycles to smart homes, from industrial sensors to remote medical devices, it seems that as long as you insert an IoT card, the device can come to life. But is reality really that simple?
Many enterprises, when choosing IoT cards, often only focus on whether they can be used, neglecting whether they are suitable. As a result, after connecting the device to the internet, problems frequently arise—unstable signals, abnormal data consumption, costs exceeding expectations, and even complete disconnection in certain areas. These issues often stem from a lack of understanding of the characteristics of IoT cards.
So, does your device really need an IoT card? Or, is the IoT card you selected truly compatible with your needs? Let’s take a look at these key points.
1. What kind of network does your device actually need?
The core function of an IoT card is to connect devices to the internet, but different devices have vastly different network requirements.
For example, the positioning data of shared bicycles only requires low-frequency, low-data transmission, but has extremely high requirements for network coverage, as the bicycles may appear in any corner of the city. In this case, a low-cost 2G IoT card with wide coverage may be more suitable than 5G.
On the other hand, devices like remote video surveillance are sensitive to bandwidth and latency, making 4G or even 5G a better choice. If you use a 2G card to save costs, the video may lag and have high latency, significantly undermining the purpose of surveillance.
Therefore, the first step in selecting an IoT card is not to look at the price, but to clarify what kind of network support your device actually needs.
2. Data Consumption: Don’t Let “Unlimited Data” Fool You
Many IoT card suppliers like to promote “unlimited data,” which sounds tempting, but in actual use, it often hides various limitations. For example, speeds may be reduced after reaching a certain usage limit, or the service may only be available in specific areas.
If your device only transmits a few KB of data daily, then “unlimited data” is indeed irrelevant. However, if your device needs to continuously transmit high-definition video or large amounts of sensor data, you need to carefully calculate data consumption.
A more realistic issue is that IoT cards typically use a “pool sharing” model, where multiple cards share a single data pool. If one card consumes data abnormally (for example, due to a malicious attack or a program bug), it may quickly deplete the entire data pool, affecting other devices.
So, don’t just look at the “unlimited” in advertisements; calculate your actual needs and choose a reasonable data plan for a more reliable approach.
3. Signal Coverage: Where Will Your Device Operate?
IoT cards rely on carrier base stations, and the signal strength varies greatly between different regions and carriers.
For example, if your device is deployed in a remote mountainous area, but the IoT card uses a carrier with strong urban coverage, the device may frequently go “offline.” Conversely, if the device is mainly used in urban areas but you choose a network with wide coverage but low bandwidth, it may also affect performance.
Some enterprises choose IoT cards that support multi-carrier switching (such as eSIM technology) for insurance, allowing automatic network switching in areas with weak signals to improve stability. Of course, this solution is more expensive, and whether it is worth the investment depends on the specific scenario.
4. Pricing Model: Will Long-Term Use Lead to Pitfalls?
The pricing models for IoT cards are varied; some charge based on data usage, some based on connection duration, and others use tiered pricing.
There are many cases where initial low prices attract customers, only to quietly increase prices later. For example, some suppliers offer ultra-low price plans for the first year, only to double the price in the second year, making the cost of switching higher than continuing to use the service.
Additionally, some IoT cards have “silence period” restrictions, meaning that if they are not used for a long time (such as several months without data interaction), the carrier may suspend service or even terminate the account. If your device operates intermittently (such as certain agricultural monitoring devices), you need to pay special attention to this.
5. Management and Maintenance: Can You Monitor Device Status Anytime?
Once the device is connected to the internet, management becomes another challenge.
-
Does your IoT card support remote management?
-
Can you receive alerts in a timely manner for abnormal data consumption?
-
Can you batch query the online status of devices?
If there is no comprehensive management backend, you may only discover that a batch of devices has been offline for several days when users complain.
Some suppliers offer visualization platforms that can monitor each card’s data usage, signal strength, online status, etc., in real-time, which is especially important for large-scale deployments. If it’s just a few devices, manual management may be feasible, but if it involves thousands of terminals, not having automated maintenance tools can be very troublesome.
Conclusion: IoT Cards Are Not a Universal Solution
IoT cards indeed make it easier for devices to connect to the internet, but they are not a universal solution that works just by plugging them in. Different devices and scenarios have completely different network requirements.
Before choosing an IoT card, it’s worth asking yourself a few questions:
-
What kind of network does my device need? (Low-speed wide coverage, or high-speed low latency?)
-
How much data consumption is there? (Will it suddenly spike?)
-
Where will the device operate? (Is the signal coverage sufficient?)
-
Is the pricing model sustainable? (Will prices increase unexpectedly?)
-
Is there a convenient management method? (Can I monitor device status in real-time?)
Only by considering all these factors can you find the IoT card that truly suits your needs, rather than regretting it after problems arise.
After all, getting devices “connected” is just the first step; ensuring they connect “stably, efficiently, and economically” is the real challenge.