If you find this article beneficial, feel free to share it.
In this digital age, every online transaction and every encrypted email relies on a sophisticated encryption system. Today, I want to talk about the RSA algorithm (Rivest-Shamir-Adleman, named after its three inventors), the foundation of public key encryption that builds a security barrier in the digital world using the power of mathematics. RSA is an asymmetric encryption algorithm that uses a pair of keys: a public key for encrypting data, which can be shared openly; and a private key for decrypting data, which must be kept strictly confidential. This asymmetry solves the key distribution problem in traditional encryption, laying the foundation for modern cryptography. Let’s unveil the mystery of RSA and see how this algorithm, born in 1977, works.
The Mathematical Foundations of RSA Algorithm
The security of RSA is based on two key theorems in number theory: Euler’s Theorem and Modular Inverse. These seemingly profound mathematical theories are the foundation of the RSA algorithm.
Euler’s Theorem
Euler’s Theorem is an important theorem in number theory that describes the periodicity of powers under modular arithmetic. Specifically, for two coprime positive integers n and a, Euler’s Theorem states:
a^φ(n) ≡ 1 mod n
where φ(n) is the Euler’s Totient Function, representing the count of positive integers less than n that are coprime to n. For example, if n is the product of two primes p and q, then φ(n) = (p-1)(q-1). Euler’s Theorem provides the mathematical basis for the encryption and decryption processes in RSA, ensuring that the encrypted data can be correctly decrypted.
The meaning of a^φ(n) ≡ 1 mod n:This equation indicates that when a is coprime to n, the remainder of a raised to the φ(n) power divided by n is 1. In other words, a^φ(n) minus 1 is divisible by n. This property is crucial in RSA because it guarantees the correctness of encryption and decryption: in RSA, the processes of encryption and decryption rely on modular exponentiation. Specifically, during encryption, c = m^e mod n is calculated, and during decryption, m = c^d mod n is computed. To ensure that the original data m can be recovered after decryption, we need to ensure:
c^d ≡ (me)^d ≡ m^(ed) ≡ m mod n
According to Euler’s Theorem, if ed ≡ 1 mod φ(n), then m^(ed) ≡ m mod n. Therefore, Euler’s Theorem ensures the correctness of encryption and decryption.
Example:Assuming p=3, q=5, then n=pq=15.Calculating φ(n) = (p-1)(q-1) = 2×4 = 8.This means there are 8 numbers less than 15 that are coprime to 15, which are 1, 2, 4, 7, 8, 11, 13, 14.
What is the periodicity of powers under modular arithmetic?The periodicity of powers under modular arithmetic refers to the fact that for an integer a and modulus n, when a is coprime to n, the powers of a exhibit periodic behavior under mod n. Specifically, there exists a smallest positive integer k such that a^k ≡ 1 mod n, and this k is called the order of a. Euler’s Theorem tells us that this k must be a divisor of φ(n). Therefore, a^φ(n) ≡ 1 mod n, which reflects the periodicity of powers under modular arithmetic. This periodicity is significant in cryptography. First, it ensures the correctness of the encryption and decryption processes: by choosing appropriate exponents e and d such that ed ≡ 1 mod φ(n), we can utilize periodicity to restore the encrypted data to its original form. Secondly, periodicity also provides security for RSA: an attacker needs to know φ(n) to break RSA, and calculating φ(n) is equivalent to factoring n, which is an extremely difficult problem on classical computers.
The concept of coprime:Two integers a and b are coprime if their greatest common divisor (GCD) is 1, meaning they have no common divisors other than 1. For example, 8 and 15 are coprime because their only common divisor is 1; whereas 8 and 12 are not coprime because they have a common divisor of 4.
Example:Assuming n=10, the numbers coprime to 10 are 1, 3, 7, 9, thus φ(10)=4.Taking a=3, which is coprime to 10. According to Euler’s Theorem:3^4 ≡ 81 ≡ 1 mod 10Calculating 81 ÷ 10 = 8 remainder 1, indeed satisfies 3^4 ≡ 1 mod 10.
Modular Inverse
The modular inverse refers to the multiplicative inverse under modular arithmetic. For an integer a and modulus n, if there exists an integer b such that:
a × b ≡ 1 mod n
then b is the inverse of a under mod n. In the RSA algorithm, the relationship between the public key e and the private key d is based on the property of the modular inverse: ed ≡ 1 mod φ(n). This means that d is the inverse of e under mod φ(n). The existence and uniqueness of the modular inverse ensure the correctness and security of the RSA key pair.
The meaning of a × b ≡ 1 mod n:This equation indicates that the product of a and b divided by n leaves a remainder of 1. In other words, a × b minus 1 is divisible by n. This property is crucial in RSA because it guarantees the correct pairing of the public and private keys.In RSA, the relationship between the public key e and the private key d is ed ≡ 1 mod φ(n). This means that d is the multiplicative inverse of e under mod φ(n). This property ensures the correctness of encryption and decryption because:
c^d ≡ (me)^d ≡ m^(ed) ≡ m mod n
Since ed ≡ 1 mod φ(n), according to Euler’s Theorem, m^(ed) ≡ m mod n. Therefore, the existence and uniqueness of the modular inverse ensure the correctness and security of the RSA key pair.
What is the multiplicative inverse?The multiplicative inverse refers to the “reciprocal” of a number under modular arithmetic. For an integer a and modulus n, if there exists an integer b such that a × b ≡ 1 mod n, then b is the multiplicative inverse of a under mod n. For example, under mod 7, the multiplicative inverse of 3 is 5, because 3 × 5 = 15 ≡ 1 mod 7.
Example:Assuming a=3, n=7. We need to find an integer b such that 3 × b ≡ 1 mod 7.Trying b=5:3 × 5 = 15 ≡ 1 mod 7because 15 ÷ 7 = 2 remainder 1, so 5 is the inverse of 3 under mod 7.
How RSA Works
The RSA algorithm consists of three key steps: key generation, encryption, and decryption. During the key generation process, two large prime numbers p and q are chosen, n=pq and φ(n)=(p-1)(q-1) are calculated, and then public key e and private key d are selected such that ed ≡ 1 mod φ(n). During encryption, the plaintext m is converted to ciphertext c using c = m^e mod n; during decryption, the plaintext is restored using m = c^d mod n.
A Simple Example
Let’s understand how RSA works through a specific example:
Choose p=3, q=11
Calculate n=pq=3×11=33
Calculate φ(n)=(p-1)(q-1)=(3-1)(11-1)=20
Select e=3 (which is coprime to 20)
Calculate d=7 (because 3×7=21≡1 mod 20)
Now, the public key is (n=33, e=3), and the private key is d=7
Encryption process:Assuming plaintext m=2c = m^e mod n = 2^3 mod 33 = 8
Decryption process:m = c^d mod n = 8^7 mod 33Calculating 8^7 = 20971522097152 ÷ 33 = 63550…2 (remainder 2)So m=2, successfully recovering the plaintext
Why RSA is Secure Against Classical Computing
The security of RSA relies on the difficulty of factoring large integers. Specifically, the RSA public key contains a large integer n, which is the product of two large primes p and q. To break RSA, an attacker needs to factor p and q from n, which is an extremely difficult problem on classical computers. Currently, the best classical algorithms (such as the general number field sieve) have an exponential time complexity for factoring a large integer n, meaning that as the number of bits in n increases, the time required for factoring increases dramatically. For example, factoring a 2048-bit n would take millions of years or longer, even with the most powerful supercomputers. Therefore, in a non-quantum computing environment, RSA is considered relatively secure.
The Challenges of RSA in the Face of Quantum Computing
Although the RSA algorithm is currently secure, the rise of quantum computing poses significant challenges. This threat primarily comes from Shor’s algorithm, which is an efficient factoring algorithm that can run on quantum computers. The security of RSA relies on the difficulty of factoring large integers, while Shor’s algorithm can accomplish this task in polynomial time.
Specifically, for an n-bit RSA key, classical computers require exponential time (approximately exp(n^(1/3))) to break it, while quantum computers using Shor’s algorithm only need polynomial time (approximately n^3). This means that once practical quantum computers become available, existing RSA encryption will no longer be secure.
The Dawn of Post-Quantum Cryptography
In response to the challenges posed by quantum computing, the cryptography community has begun developing new encryption algorithms that are resistant to quantum attacks. These algorithms are primarily based on several directions: lattice-based cryptosystems (such as Kyber, Dilithium), multivariate public key cryptosystems (such as Rainbow), hash-based signature schemes (such as SPHINCS+), coding-based cryptosystems (such as Classic McEliece), and supersingular isogeny-based cryptography (such as SIKE). These algorithms do not rely on the difficulty of factoring large integers or discrete logarithm problems, thus can resist quantum attacks. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is currently working on post-quantum cryptography standardization, with new encryption standards expected to be established in the coming years.
The Real-World Significance and Future of RSA
The RSA algorithm is a guardian of contemporary digital security. From SSL/TLS protocols to digital signatures, from email encryption to blockchain technology, RSA is ubiquitous. It reminds us that in this digital world, mathematics is not just an abstract theory but a solid shield protecting our privacy and security.
Understanding the RSA algorithm not only allows us to appreciate the beauty of mathematics but also makes us aware of the importance of digital security. In this age of information explosion, it is these ingenious algorithms that safeguard our digital lives. Let us pay tribute to the mathematicians and cryptographers who silently protect our security, and let us place greater emphasis on personal information protection, working together to maintain the security of the digital world. At the same time, we must also pay attention to the development of cryptography to prepare for the upcoming era of quantum computing.
About Me:
I am a senior software engineer at SAP with over 8 years of development and security experience, focusing on the field of DevSecOps. I possess technical expertise in full-stack development, product security, user experience design, and machine learning, and I am a SAP certified product security expert.
My professional background includes full-stack JavaScript and Python development, UX design, localization, and the application of design thinking. I have been responsible for software development, CI/CD automation, security compliance management, threat modeling, and vulnerability assessment in various industry projects. Additionally, I have conducted in-depth research in natural language processing (NLP) and data analysis.
I hold an MBA, a Master’s degree in Internet Economics (M.A.), and a Bachelor’s degree in Computer Science (B.Sc.).
As a technology-driven professional, I am committed to creating value for businesses through innovative and efficient solutions. If you are interested in my background, feel free to contact me!