Today, an old client contacted me regarding a small project involving circuit breakers, presence sensors, and sockets. He mentioned wanting to continue using the privatized 2.4G solution he had used before. I recommended our Bluetooth Mesh solution, but he expressed doubts about the stability of Bluetooth Mesh, citing poor experiences with Tuya and Xiaomi products in the past. I informed him that our Bluetooth system is not significantly different in stability from the previously customized 2.4G solution, and that through technical means, we can fully achieve or even exceed the performance of the previous 2.4G system. However, his concern was: if large companies like Tuya and Xiaomi have not solved the stability issues of Bluetooth Mesh, how can we, as a small company, accomplish this? In fact, the quality of a communication system can be validated through actual testing, which cannot be faked. If there are shortcomings, we can completely address them through system compensation or hardware optimization. For example, the efficiency differences between the Sig Mesh flooding protocol and adaptive path Mesh highlight the importance of algorithm optimization. An excellent Bluetooth Mesh solution must be based on an adaptive path distributed decentralized system, achieving significant improvements in user experience and performance through algorithm optimization.