As the first rays of morning sunlight filter through the curtains, the smart speaker automatically plays the weather forecast; when leaving home, the security system arms itself, and the air conditioning and lights turn off automatically; on the way home from work, the phone remotely starts the vacuum cleaner and preheats the water heater… These scenarios, once only found in science fiction movies, have now become the daily routine for smart home users. However, behind this home revolution driven by IoT technology, a silent patent offensive and defensive battle is quietly unfolding. From Wi-Fi communication protocols to AI voice interaction, from edge computing to DDoS attack defense, the patent landscape in the smart home sector has become the core battleground for companies vying for market influence.
1. Patent Layout: From Point Breakthrough to Ecological Siege
1. The “Positioning Battle” of Core Technology Patents
The patent layout in smart homes exhibits a clear “technology pyramid” structure. Taking IoT communication protocols as an example, wireless communication technologies such as Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and ZigBee serve as the “nervous system” of smart home devices. According to statistics, the number of patent applications related to communication protocols in the global smart home sector has exceeded 100,000, with companies like Huawei, Qualcomm, and Samsung forming patent pools to monopolize next-generation technologies such as Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.0. For instance, Huawei has laid out over 2,000 patents in the smart home field, covering core technologies such as device interconnectivity protocols and edge computing architectures.
In the field of AI voice interaction, Chinese companies like iFlytek and Baidu have optimized voice recognition accuracy through deep learning algorithms, reducing the error rate to below 0.5%. These companies have built technological barriers by applying for patents such as “Deep Learning-Based Smart Home Voice Recognition Systems.” Meanwhile, Amazon’s Alexa and Google’s Google Assistant have attracted third-party developers to participate in ecosystem construction through open platform strategies, forming a dual moat of “patents + ecosystem.”
2. The “Land Grabbing Movement” of Application Scenario Patents
The patent layout for application scenarios in smart homes shows a trend towards “whole-home intelligence.” From smart locks and smart lighting to health monitoring devices, companies are covering the entire user life cycle through scenario-based patents. For example, Xiaomi has applied for a patent for a “Method for Automatic Switching of Scene Modes Based on User Behavior Analysis,” which achieves coordinated control of lighting, curtains, and air conditioning by analyzing user habits. Haier Smart Home focuses on the “smart kitchen” scenario and has applied for a patent for the “Smart Refrigerator Ingredient Management Method and System,” which uses image recognition technology to remind users of ingredient expiration dates and recommend recipes.
It is noteworthy that the patent layout for whole-home smart solutions is upgrading from “single product intelligence” to “system integration.” For instance, Huawei’s “Whole-Home Smart Host” patent achieves centralized control of water, electricity, and gas through PLC-IoT technology, while Orvibo’s “MixPad Super Smart Switch” integrates devices from different brands through multi-protocol compatibility technology. These patents not only enhance user experience but also become key bargaining chips for companies competing in the high-end market.
3. The “Defensive Works” of Network Security Patents
As the number of smart home devices surpasses 10 billion, network security has become a new focus for patent layout. LeKe Intelligent Control’s “DDoS Attack Defense Method for IoT Device Servers” patent reduces the business interruption time during attacks to milliseconds through heartbeat request monitoring and automatic address switching mechanisms. Meanwhile, Huawei’s “Data Encryption Transmission Method for Smart Home Systems” patent uses the national secret algorithm SM4 to encrypt communication data between devices, making it ten times harder to crack than traditional AES algorithms.
In the field of identity authentication, biometric technology has become the high ground for patent competition. SenseTime’s “3D Face Recognition Access Control System” patent achieves live detection through structured light technology, with an error rate of less than one in a million; while Goodix’s “Fingerprint Recognition Module Anti-Interference Method” patent addresses recognition challenges in scenarios involving wet hands and oil stains. These patents not only enhance device security but also promote the evolution of smart homes from “convenience” to “trustworthiness.”
2. Patent Offense and Defense: From Technical Barriers to Commercial Games
1. The “Pricing Power Struggle” of Standard Essential Patents (SEPs)
In the smart home sector, SEPs for communication protocols like Wi-Fi and Bluetooth have become the focal point of corporate competition. For example, Qualcomm earned huge revenues through SEP licensing during the 3G/4G era and is now replicating this strategy in the smart home sector. According to statistics, about 70% of global smart home devices rely on Wi-Fi 6 technology, and companies like Qualcomm and Broadcom charge patent fees of $0.5 to $2 per device through SEP cross-licensing agreements.
Chinese companies’ response strategy is “technical countermeasures + standard participation.” For instance, Huawei submitted over 500 proposals in the IEEE 802.11ax standard formulation, promoting PLC-IoT technology as an alternative for smart home communication. Meanwhile, Unisoc is developing RISC-V architecture chips to reduce dependence on ARM architecture, thereby avoiding SEP licensing risks.
2. The “Alliance of Cross-Licensing”
Faced with a complex patent landscape, companies achieve risk-sharing through cross-licensing. For example, Xiaomi signed a patent cross-licensing agreement with Nokia to gain patent usage rights in areas such as 5G and Wi-Fi 6; while Haier and Siemens collaborated in the field of smart home energy management, sharing patents such as the “Smart Grid Load Forecasting Method.” This “patent alliance” not only reduces litigation costs but also promotes the unification of technical standards.
However, cross-licensing also harbors risks. For instance, a certain smart speaker company was forced to pay 3% of its sales as patent fees for not obtaining authorization for a voice recognition patent, resulting in a 15% drop in product profit margins. This serves as a warning to companies: in patent layout, one must both “attack and defend.”
3. The “Killing Weapon” of Patent Litigation
In recent years, patent litigation in the smart home sector has exploded. For example, Dyson and SharkNinja engaged in a multinational lawsuit over “bladeless fan airflow control technology,” ultimately resulting in Dyson’s victory and a $120 million compensation. Meanwhile, Chinese companies have frequently faced patent attacks overseas: a certain vacuum cleaner company was banned from sale in Germany for infringing iRobot’s “navigation positioning method” patent, resulting in losses exceeding $50 million.
To cope with litigation risks, companies are establishing “patent early warning mechanisms.” For instance, Midea Group has set up a patent intelligence center to monitor global smart home patent dynamics in real-time, allowing for preemptive design avoidance or invalidation of potential risk patents. TCL, on the other hand, transfers litigation costs to insurance companies by purchasing patent insurance.
3. Future Trends: From Patent Competition to Ecological Win-Win
1. Patent Standardization: From “Feudal Fragmentation” to “Unified World”
As the penetration rate of the smart home market exceeds 30%, patent standardization has become an industry consensus. For example, the “Smart Home Interoperability White Paper” led by the China Academy of Information and Communications Technology has attracted participation from over 50 companies, including Huawei, Xiaomi, and Haier, promoting protocols like PLC-IoT and Matter to become industry standards. In the future, patent standardization will present three major trends: first, upgrading from “device-level” to “system-level”; second, extending from “technical standards” to “security standards”; and third, expanding from “domestic standards” to “international standards.”
2. Patent Operation: From “Sleeping Assets” to “Liquid Capital”
Patent operation is becoming a new profit growth point for companies. For example, Qualcomm earns over $6 billion annually through patent licensing, while Huawei has launched a “Patent Open Licensing Program” to license patents for 5G, Wi-Fi 6, and others to small and medium-sized enterprises under the “FRAND” principle. In the future, patent operation will present three major models: first, patent pool sharing; second, patent securitization; and third, patent open-source. For instance, Xiaomi has open-sourced some smart home patents to attract developers to co-build the ecosystem.
3. Patent Ethics: From “Technological Neutrality” to “Responsibility”
As smart home devices deeply integrate into users’ lives, patent ethics issues are becoming increasingly prominent. For example, a certain smart camera company was fined €225 million by the EU for not adequately disclosing the scope of data collection. This serves as a warning to companies: in patent layout, it is essential to balance technological innovation with user privacy. In the future, patent ethics will present three major directions: first, establishing “algorithm transparency” standards; second, promoting the “data minimization” principle; and third, improving mechanisms for “user awareness rights.”
Long press to recognize the QR code for one-on-one service!
