✅ Author Profile: A research enthusiast and Matlab simulation developer, skilled in data processing, modeling and simulation, program design, obtaining complete code, reproducing papers, and scientific simulation.
🍎 Previous reviews, follow the personal homepage:Matlab Research Studio
🍊 Personal motto: Seek knowledge through investigation, complete Matlab code and simulation consultation available via private message.
Intelligent Optimization Algorithms Neural Network Prediction Radar Communication Wireless Sensors Power Systems
Signal Processing Image Processing Path Planning Cellular Automata Drones
Physical Applications Machine Learning Series Workshop Scheduling SeriesFiltering and Tracking Series Data Analysis Series
Image Processing Series
🔥 Content Introduction
Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks (UWSN) are crucial supporting technologies in fields such as ocean exploration, environmental monitoring, resource exploration, and national defense security, and have received widespread attention in recent years. However, the complexity and uniqueness of the underwater environment, such as high attenuation, multipath effects, significant delay variations, narrow bandwidth, and limited node energy, make traditional wireless sensor network routing protocols unsuitable for direct application in UWSN. Therefore, designing an efficient, reliable, and energy-saving routing protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks is key to promoting the practical application of UWSN. This article will discuss “An Effective Routing Protocol for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks,” exploring its design challenges, key technologies, and future development directions.
First, it is crucial to understand the challenges faced in the design of UWSN routing protocols. The characteristics of the underwater environment impose stringent requirements on routing protocols:
- High Attenuation: Acoustic waves are the primary means of communication underwater, but the propagation attenuation of acoustic waves in water is much greater than that of terrestrial radio waves. The higher the frequency, the greater the attenuation; therefore, UWSN typically uses lower frequency acoustic waves for communication, which limits the data transmission rate. This means that routing protocols must tolerate higher signal attenuation and select appropriate transmission distances to ensure communication reliability.
- Multipath Effects: Due to the complexity of the underwater environment, such as surface reflections, seabed reflections, and temperature gradient changes, acoustic signals undergo multiple reflections and refractions, resulting in multiple paths to the receiving end, causing multipath effects. Multipath effects can lead to signal interference and delays, reducing communication quality; thus, routing protocols need to effectively mitigate the impact of multipath effects.
- Significant Delay Variations: The propagation speed of acoustic waves in water is much lower than that of radio waves, and the speed is affected by factors such as water temperature, salinity, and depth, leading to significant variations in propagation delay. This poses severe challenges for delay-sensitive applications in UWSN, requiring routing protocols to adapt to delay variations and select appropriate routing paths to meet application delay requirements.
- Narrow Bandwidth: Due to the frequency characteristics of acoustic waves and the limitations of the underwater environment, the available bandwidth in UWSN is very limited. Therefore, routing protocols need to efficiently utilize limited bandwidth resources, avoid redundant data transmission, and optimize data transmission efficiency.
- Limited Node Energy: UWSN nodes are typically battery-powered, and replacing batteries is very difficult, if not impossible. Therefore, energy efficiency is a critical goal in the design of UWSN routing protocols. Routing protocols need to minimize energy consumption of nodes as much as possible to extend the network’s lifespan.
- Three-Dimensional Space: Unlike terrestrial WSNs, nodes in UWSN can be deployed in three-dimensional space, complicating the design of routing protocols. It is necessary to consider the spatial positions and mobility of nodes and select appropriate routing algorithms to ensure network connectivity and reliability.
In response to the above challenges, researchers have proposed many effective UWSN routing protocols. These protocols can be broadly categorized into the following types:
- Flooding Protocols: Flooding protocols are the simplest routing protocols; each node broadcasts the received data packet to all neighboring nodes. Although flooding protocols ensure reliable data packet transmission, they generate a large amount of redundant data and energy consumption, making them unsuitable for UWSN.
- Geographic Routing Protocols: Geographic routing protocols use the geographic location information of nodes for routing decisions. Nodes select the nearest neighbor node to the target node as the next hop based on the geographic location of the target node. Common geographic routing protocols include Depth-Based Routing (DBR) and Void-Aware Pressure Routing (VAPR). DBR uses node depth information for routing, while VAPR considers void areas to avoid data packets getting trapped in voids.
- Energy-Aware Routing Protocols: The goal of energy-aware routing protocols is to extend the network’s lifespan. These protocols consider the remaining energy of nodes, selecting nodes with more remaining energy as the next hop to avoid excessive energy consumption of certain nodes.
- Clustering-Based Routing Protocols: Clustering-based routing protocols divide the network into multiple clusters, each with a cluster head node. The cluster head node is responsible for collecting data from nodes within the cluster and transmitting the data to the sink node. Clustering-based routing protocols can effectively reduce the communication complexity of the network and balance the energy consumption of nodes.
- Data Aggregation Routing Protocols: Data aggregation routing protocols reduce the amount of data that needs to be transmitted by aggregating data during transmission, thereby lowering energy consumption and improving network performance.
In recent years, some researchers have attempted to apply machine learning and artificial intelligence techniques to the design of UWSN routing protocols. For example, reinforcement learning algorithms can be used to learn optimal routing strategies, or neural networks can be used to predict underwater channel characteristics, thereby improving the performance of routing protocols.
However, existing UWSN routing protocols still have some shortcomings that require further research and improvement. For example:
- Adaptability: Most existing routing protocols are static and cannot adapt well to changes in the underwater environment. More adaptive routing protocols need to be designed that can dynamically adjust routing strategies based on changes in the underwater environment.
- Reliability: The reliability of underwater communication remains a challenge. More reliable routing protocols need to be designed that can effectively handle packet loss and errors, ensuring reliable data transmission.
- Energy Efficiency: Energy consumption of nodes remains an important consideration. More energy-efficient routing protocols need to be designed that can further reduce node energy consumption and extend the network’s lifespan.
- Security: As UWSN applications become more widespread, security issues are becoming increasingly prominent. Secure routing protocols need to be designed to prevent malicious attacks and data leaks.
⛳️ Operating Results
🔗 References
[1] Feng Yachao, He Kang, Yang Hongli, et al. Research and Optimization of a Data Collection Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks [J]. Journal of Sensor Technology, 2014, 27(3):6. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1699.2014.03.016.
[2] Tao Qiang. Research on Routing Optimization of Wireless Sensor Networks Based on Ant Colony Algorithm [D]. Anhui University of Science and Technology, 2015. DOI:10.7666/d.Y2768360.
📣 Partial Code
🎈 Some theoretical references from network literature, please contact the author for removal if there is any infringement
👇 Follow me to receive a wealth of Matlab e-books and mathematical modeling materials
🏆 Our team specializes in guiding customized MATLAB simulations in various research fields, helping to realize research dreams:
🌈 Improvements and applications of various intelligent optimization algorithms
Production scheduling, economic scheduling, assembly line scheduling, charging optimization, workshop scheduling, departure optimization, reservoir scheduling, three-dimensional packing, logistics site selection, cargo location optimization, bus scheduling optimization, charging station layout optimization, workshop layout optimization, container ship loading optimization, pump combination optimization, medical resource allocation optimization, facility layout optimization, visual domain base station and drone site selection optimization, knapsack problem, wind farm layout, time slot allocation optimization, optimal distributed generation unit allocation, multi-stage pipeline maintenance, factory-center-demand point three-level site selection problem, emergency supply distribution center site selection, base station site selection, road lamp post arrangement, hub node deployment, transmission line typhoon monitoring devices, container scheduling, unit optimization, investment optimization portfolio, cloud server combination optimization, antenna linear array distribution optimization, CVRP problem, VRPPD problem, multi-center VRP problem, multi-center multi-vehicle VRP problem, dynamic VRP problem, two-layer vehicle routing planning (2E-VRP), electric vehicle routing planning (EVRP), hybrid vehicle routing planning, mixed flow shop problem, order splitting scheduling problem, bus scheduling optimization problem, flight shuttle vehicle scheduling problem, site selection path planning problem, port scheduling, port bridge scheduling, parking space allocation, airport flight scheduling, leak source localization
🌈 Time series, regression, classification, clustering, and dimensionality reduction in machine learning and deep learning
2.1 BP time series, regression prediction, and classification
2.2 ENS acoustic neural network time series, regression prediction, and classification
2.3 SVM/CNN-SVM/LSSVM/RVM support vector machine series time series, regression prediction, and classification
2.4 CNN|TCN|GCN convolutional neural network series time series, regression prediction, and classification
2.5 ELM/KELM/RELM/DELM extreme learning machine series time series, regression prediction, and classification
2.6 GRU/Bi-GRU/CNN-GRU/CNN-BiGRU gated neural network time series, regression prediction, and classification
2.7 Elman recurrent neural network time series, regression prediction, and classification
2.8 LSTM/BiLSTM/CNN-LSTM/CNN-BiLSTM long short-term memory neural network series time series, regression prediction, and classification
2.9 RBF radial basis function neural network time series, regression prediction, and classification
2.10 DBN deep belief network time series, regression prediction, and classification
2.11 FNN fuzzy neural network time series, regression prediction
2.12 RF random forest time series, regression prediction, and classification
2.13 BLS broad learning system time series, regression prediction, and classification
2.14 PNN pulse neural network classification
2.15 Fuzzy wavelet neural network prediction and classification
2.16 Time series, regression prediction, and classification
2.17 Time series, regression prediction, and classification
2.18 XGBOOST ensemble learning time series, regression prediction, and classification
2.19 Transform various combinations of time series, regression prediction, and classification
Directions cover wind power prediction, photovoltaic prediction, battery life prediction, radiation source identification, traffic flow prediction, load forecasting, stock price prediction, PM2.5 concentration prediction, battery health status prediction, electricity consumption prediction, water optical parameter inversion, NLOS signal identification, precise prediction of subway stops, transformer fault diagnosis
🌈 In image processing
Image recognition, image segmentation, image detection, image hiding, image registration, image stitching, image fusion, image enhancement, image compressed sensing
🌈 In path planning
Traveling salesman problem (TSP), vehicle routing problem (VRP, MVRP, CVRP, VRPTW, etc.), drone three-dimensional path planning, drone collaboration, drone formation, robot path planning, grid map path planning, multimodal transport problem, electric vehicle routing planning (EVRP), two-layer vehicle routing planning (2E-VRP), hybrid vehicle routing planning, ship trajectory planning, full path planning, warehouse patrol
🌈 In drone applications
Drone path planning, drone control, drone formation, drone collaboration, drone task allocation, drone secure communication trajectory online optimization, vehicle collaborative drone path planning
🌈 In communication
Sensor deployment optimization, communication protocol optimization, routing optimization, target localization optimization, Dv-Hop localization optimization, Leach protocol optimization, WSN coverage optimization, multicast optimization, RSSI localization optimization, underwater acoustic communication, communication upload and download allocation
🌈 In signal processing
Signal recognition, signal encryption, signal denoising, signal enhancement, radar signal processing, signal watermark embedding and extraction, EMG signals, EEG signals, signal timing optimization, ECG signals, DOA estimation, encoding and decoding, variational mode decomposition, pipeline leakage, filters, digital signal processing + transmission + analysis + denoising, digital signal modulation, bit error rate, signal estimation, DTMF, signal detection
🌈 In power systems
Microgrid optimization, reactive power optimization, distribution network reconstruction, energy storage configuration, orderly charging, MPPT optimization, household electricity
🌈 In cellular automata
Traffic flow, crowd evacuation, virus spread, crystal growth, metal corrosion
🌈 In radar
Kalman filter tracking, trajectory association, trajectory fusion, SOC estimation, array optimization, NLOS identification
🌈 In workshop scheduling
Zero-wait flow shop scheduling problem (NWFSP) , Permutation flow shop scheduling problem (PFSP) , Hybrid flow shop scheduling problem (HFSP) , zero idle flow shop scheduling problem (NIFSP), distributed permutation flow shop scheduling problem (DPFSP), blocking flow shop scheduling problem (BFSP)
👇