In-Depth Analysis of Siemens PLC Safety Control System Design

▼Click the card below to follow me

▲

Click the card above to follow me

In-Depth Analysis of Siemens PLC Safety Control System Design: Methodology for Building Intrinsically Safe Automation Systems

Hello everyone, I am XXX.

Today we will discuss how to design a reliable safety control system using Siemens PLC.

This topic may sound impressive, but it is essentially about using PLCs to protect our equipment and personnel safety.

Imagine, the PLC is like the brain of the factory, it must always be vigilant to prevent problems before they occur.

Basic Concepts of Safety Control Systems

A safety control system, as the name suggests, is a system designed to ensure production safety.

Its main task is to eliminate dangers before they manifest.

For example, it is like a gas alarm in your home that warns you to run when it detects gas.

In the industrial field, this “gas alarm” is composed of PLCs and various sensors.

Siemens PLCs have unique features in safety control. They come with specialized safety CPUs and I/O modules that ensure safe shutdown even in the worst-case scenario. It’s like putting a bulletproof vest on a regular PLC, making it more resilient.

Hardware Configuration

A typical Siemens safety PLC system includes:

Safety CPU (e.g., S7-1500F)
Safety I/O modules
Safety sensors (e.g., emergency stop buttons, light curtains)
Safety actuators (e.g., safety relays)

Note: Safety modules usually have yellow markings, so do not confuse them with regular modules.

Below is a simplified system block diagram:

[Safety Sensor] --> [Safety Input Module] --> [Safety CPU] --> [Safety Output Module] --> [Safety Actuator]
                                    |
                                    v
                              [Standard I/O Module]

Safety Program Design

Siemens provides STEP 7 Safety software for writing safety programs. It is based on traditional STEP 7 but adds many safety features.

Example of Safety Function Block

Network 1: Emergency Stop Function
+---[ ]---+---[ ]---+---( )---+
|   E0.0  |   E0.1  |   A0.0  |
|         |         |         |
+---[/]---+         |         |
    E0.2            |         |
                    |         |
+---[OPN]---+-------+         |
|   "Safety|                  |
|   FB"    |                  |
+----------+                  |

// E0.0: Emergency stop button
// E0.1: Reset button
// E0.2: System running feedback
// A0.0: Safety output

// Explanation:
// When the emergency stop button is not pressed (E0.0 is 1) and the system is running (E0.2 is 0),
// if the reset button is pressed (E0.1 is 1), then the safety output A0.0 is set to 1.
// The safety function block "Safety FB" is used for additional safety logic checks.

This example demonstrates a basic emergency stop function. In practical applications, we usually incorporate more safety checks and interlocking logic.

Safety Programming Tips

Redundant Design: Critical safety functions should have backups, just like an airplane has multiple engines.
Fail-Safe: The system should automatically enter a safe state in case of failure, just like an elevator stops at the nearest floor during a power outage.
Regular Self-Checks: Set up diagnostic programs to regularly check if safety functions are operating normally.
Access Management: Modifications to safety programs should have strict access controls to prevent unauthorized changes.

Practical Application Case

Let’s look at a practical example: the reactor control system in a chemical plant.

Main safety functions include:

Automatic shutdown of heating when temperature exceeds limit
Automatic shutdown of feeding and opening of pressure relief valve when pressure exceeds limit
Stop the entire reaction process in case of stirrer failure

Key code segments:

Network 1: Temperature Monitoring
+---[ ]---+---[/]---+---( )---+
|"Temperature Sensor"|"Temperature Normal"|"Heater"  |
|   >100°C   |         |         |
+------------+---------+---------+

Network 2: Pressure Monitoring
+---[ ]---+---[/]---+---( )---+
|"Pressure Sensor"|"Pressure Normal"|"Feed Valve"  |
|   >5MPa    |         |         |
+------------+---------+---[ ]---+
                           "Pressure Relief Valve"

Network 3: Stirrer Monitoring
+---[/]---+---[ ]---+---( )---+
|"Stirrer Feedback"|"System Running"|"Total Control" |
|           |         |         |
+-----------+---------+---------+

// Explanation:
// Network 1: When temperature exceeds 100°C, turn off the heater
// Network 2: When pressure exceeds 5MPa, turn off the feed valve and open the pressure relief valve
// Network 3: When there is no feedback signal from the stirrer, stop the entire system operation

Common Issues and Solutions

False Triggering of Safety CircuitCause: Possible sensor failure or wiring issuesSolution: Use sensors with self-diagnostic functions and calibrate regularly
Delayed Response of Safety FunctionsCause: Program scan cycle too long or communication delaySolution: Optimize program structure and use faster communication methods
Insufficient Safety LevelCause: Inadequate risk assessmentSolution: Conduct a comprehensive risk assessment again and upgrade hardware if necessary

Note: Any modifications to the safety system must undergo strict testing and validation. It’s better to spend more time testing than to take risks when going live.

Conclusion and Practical Recommendations

Designing a safety control system is an important and challenging task. It requires a comprehensive understanding of the system and a clear awareness of potential risks.

Practical exercise recommendations:

Use Siemens’ simulation software S7-PLCSIM Advanced to build a virtual safety control system.
Try implementing different safety functions, such as emergency stop and safety door monitoring.
Intentionally introduce errors to see how the system reacts, which helps in understanding how safety mechanisms work.
Learn to read and understand safety standards, such as IEC 61508, which is very helpful for designing compliant systems.

Remember, safety system design is a continuous improvement process. Every accident or near-miss is an opportunity to learn and improve the system. Stay humble and vigilant because when it comes to safety issues, we can never say “foolproof”.

I hope this article provides some insights. Safety control systems are not just a pile of hardware and code, but also a respect for life and a responsibility to uphold. Let us work together to contribute to industrial safety!

Like and Share