In recent years, the smart home sector has undergone a profound technological transformation, with mainstream manufacturers abandoning the long-dominant Zigbee technology in favor of Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) as the core connection solution. This shift is the result of multiple factors, including technological evolution, market demand, and industry maturity. This article will analyze the internal logic of this industry transformation from three dimensions: technological trends, market applications, and industry maturity, revealing how BLE technology has become the new trend in the smart home field due to its comprehensive advantages.
Technological Trends: How BLE Overcomes Core Challenges of Wireless Connectivity
The choice of wireless communication technology has always revolved around several core parameters: power consumption, cost, transmission efficiency, and reliability. Breakthrough advancements in BLE (Bluetooth Low Energy) technology in these key metrics have gradually led it to replace Zigbee as the preferred solution in the smart home sector.
Power Consumption and Energy Efficiency: From its inception, BLE technology has prioritized low power consumption as a core concept, employing a “fast connection + long sleep” working mechanism, allowing devices to enter deep sleep mode with power consumption as low as 1μA when not in communication. In contrast, while Zigbee devices are also known for low power consumption, their network maintenance overhead is relatively high, as routing nodes need to operate continuously to maintain network topology, resulting in overall power consumption that is higher than that of BLE solutions. According to measured data, in typical applications such as smart locks, the battery life of BLE solutions is extended by 30%-50% compared to Zigbee, achieving a usage cycle of 2-3 years.
Data Transmission and Network Architecture: The BLE 5.0 version has increased the data transmission rate to 2Mbps, far exceeding Zigbee’s 250Kbps. In terms of latency, BLE devices can transition from sleep to activation in just a few milliseconds, with connection establishment time reduced to under 3ms, while Zigbee requires 30-100ms. The networking method of BLE Mesh employs a “flooding” message propagation mechanism, which, while increasing some network traffic, greatly simplifies the complexity of network management and maintenance. Actual tests show that in a home network with 50 nodes, the deployment time of BLE Mesh is reduced by 60% compared to Zigbee networks.
Compatibility and Scalability: BLE technology inherently possesses seamless connectivity with smartphones, with the global penetration rate of BLE functionality in smartphones reaching 100%, allowing users to control devices directly through their phones without the need for additional gateways. In contrast, Zigbee devices must communicate with smartphones and other smart terminals through dedicated gateways, increasing system complexity and cost. Market research indicates that the additional gateway devices increase the initial deployment cost of Zigbee systems by over 50%. Furthermore, BLE employs a simplified protocol stack design, with abundant development tools and resources, shortening the product development cycle by 40% compared to Zigbee.
Security Mechanisms: BLE technology utilizes the AES-128 encryption algorithm, combined with the LE Secure Connections pairing mechanism, providing security comparable to Zigbee. The new features introduced in Bluetooth 5.2, such as LE Audio, not only enhance audio transmission efficiency but also improve security and multi-device connectivity capabilities. According to security test reports, BLE devices using the latest security protocols can withstand 99.6% of common wireless attacks, offering security performance on par with Zigbee.
Table: Comparison of Key Technical Indicators between BLE and Zigbee
| Technical Indicators | BLE 5.0+ | Zigbee 3.0 | Advantage Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maximum Transmission Rate | 2Mbps | 250Kbps | 8 times higher for BLE |
| Typical Sleep Power Consumption | Approximately 1μA | Approximately 5μA | 80% lower for BLE |
| Connection Establishment Time | <3ms | 30-100ms | Over 10 times faster for BLE |
| Direct Smartphone Connection Support | Native support | Requires gateway conversion | More convenient with BLE |
| Network Node Capacity | Theoretically tens of thousands | 65,000+ | Larger for Zigbee |
| Module Cost | $1-1.5 | $1.5-2 | 25% lower for BLE |
| Development Cycle | 2-3 weeks | 4-5 weeks | 40% faster for BLE |
| Security Encryption | AES-128 | AES-128 | Comparable |
Market Applications: How Consumer Demand Reshapes Technology Choices
The evolution of technology routes ultimately reflects changes in market demand. As the smart home market shifts from a technology-driven to a user experience-driven approach, BLE technology has demonstrated stronger adaptability and growth potential compared to Zigbee, primarily reflected in the following aspects:
Revolutionary Improvement in User Experience: The most significant market advantage of BLE technology lies in eliminating the essential gateway devices required by Zigbee solutions. After purchasing BLE smart home products, users can connect and control them directly through their phone’s Bluetooth function, greatly simplifying the installation and usage process. For example, products using BLE technology for smart locks allow users to pair directly with their phones and enter fingerprints or passwords for use, while Zigbee locks require configuring a gateway and complex networking settings, resulting in a noticeable difference in user experience. Consumer research data from manufacturers like Xiaomi indicates that the additional costs and configuration complexity brought by gateways are among the main factors hindering the popularization of smart homes, and switching to BLE technology has increased product installation rates by over 40%.
Fundamental Optimization of Cost Structure: BLE chips benefit from the massive scale effect of the smartphone market, with prices dropping to around $1, approximately 30-50% lower than Zigbee chips. At the system level, BLE solutions do not require gateway devices, reducing overall deployment costs by over 50%. For a typical smart lighting system, a Zigbee solution requires purchasing a gateway priced around 200 yuan, while a BLE solution can directly utilize the user’s existing phone, tablet, or smart speaker as the control center, saving thousands of yuan in initial investment for a three-bedroom apartment. The significant reduction in costs has directly driven the rapid increase in the penetration rate of smart home products.
Open Competitive Ecosystem: The Zigbee Alliance once adopted a closed strategy, limiting the compatibility of third-party products, leading to severe ecosystem fragmentation. In contrast, the Bluetooth Special Interest Group (SIG) actively promotes the unification and openness of the BLE Mesh standard, significantly enhancing interoperability between devices from different brands. Market data shows that by 2024, the number of smart home devices supporting BLE Mesh has exceeded 2,000, while the number of Zigbee devices during the same period is about 1,200, with the growth rate of the BLE ecosystem being more than twice that of Zigbee. This virtuous cycle encourages more developers to invest in the BLE ecosystem, further enriching application scenarios and device choices.
Deep Integration with Smartphones: As a standard feature of smartphones, BLE technology naturally integrates into the mobile ecosystem. Statistics show that the global penetration rate of BLE functionality in smartphones has reached 100%, providing a vast potential user base for BLE smart homes. Manufacturers can develop feature-rich mobile apps based on BLE, enabling remote control, scene linkage, data visualization, and other value-added functions, while Zigbee devices, which cannot connect directly to smartphones, must rely on gateways for communication, limiting functionality. The seamless integration of smartphones and smart homes is reshaping the interaction and control modes of the home IoT.
New Demand for Whole-Home Intelligence: As smart homes evolve from “single product intelligence” to “whole-home intelligence,” the system’s requirements for wireless technology coverage, node capacity, and stability have become higher. BLE Mesh achieves full network coverage through a “flooding broadcast” mechanism, combined with smart relay functions, effectively covering residential areas of over 300 square meters, meeting the needs of most family scenarios. Although Zigbee theoretically has a larger network scale, in practical home applications, BLE’s node capacity is fully sufficient, and it has simpler network maintenance characteristics. Market feedback indicates that whole-home intelligent systems using BLE solutions have a 35% lower failure repair rate compared to Zigbee systems, significantly reducing maintenance costs.
Table: Market Performance Comparison of BLE and Zigbee
| Market Indicators | BLE Solutions | Zigbee Solutions | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| User Installation Success Rate | 92% | 68% | +24% |
| Average Deployment Cost (Three-Bedroom Apartment) | ￥1500-2000 | ￥3000-4000 | 50% lower |
| Number of Device Types (2025) | 2000+ types | 1200+ types | 800+ more |
| Smartphone Direct Connection Support Rate | 100% | Requires gateway support | Complete difference |
| Whole-Home Intelligent Failure Rate | 6.5% | 10% | 35% lower |
| User Average Monthly Interaction Frequency | 35 times | 25 times | 40% higher |
| 2024 Shipment Growth Rate | 65% | 12% | 53 percentage points higher |
| Whole-Home Intelligence Adoption Rate (2025) | 72% | 21% | Widening gap |
Industry Maturity: How Supply Chain and Standardization Drive Technological Replacement
The widespread application of any technology relies on the support of the industrial ecosystem. BLE technology has established significant advantages in terms of industry chain maturity, standardization, and future evolution potential, all of which accelerate the technological route transformation of smart home manufacturers.
Industry Chain Maturity: The BLE chip market has formed a highly competitive landscape. Mainstream suppliers such as Nordic, TI, Dialog, and NXP cover a full range from entry-level to high-performance products, with Nordic maintaining a leading position in BLE terminal product certification, with certification numbers 3.5 times that of the second place, and a market share of over 40%. Domestic BLE chip manufacturers such as Broadcom Integrated and Hengxuan Technology are also rising rapidly. In contrast, there are fewer Zigbee chip suppliers, mainly occupied by NXP and Silicon Labs. In 2024, the market size of Zigbee chips in China is expected to be about 1.5 billion yuan, with a compound annual growth rate of 10%, far below that of the BLE chip market. The maturity of the industry chain allows the development cycle of BLE smart home products to be 40% shorter than that of Zigbee products, enabling faster responses to market demand changes.
Standardization and Openness: The differences are significant. The BLE standards managed by the Bluetooth Special Interest Group (SIG) have a high degree of unification, maintaining good compatibility between versions, and developers can access complete technical documentation for free. In contrast, the Zigbee Alliance has experienced branching and compatibility issues during the evolution of its standards, such as partial incompatibility between Zigbee 3.0 and earlier HA standards. The openness of BLE technology is also reflected in the abundance of development tools and resources, with numerous open-source BLE projects available on platforms like GitHub, and a highly active developer community. Statistics show that the number of open-source projects related to BLE is four times that of Zigbee, with a 60% faster problem-solving speed.
Integration Capability with Emerging Technologies: This determines long-term competitiveness. The direction-finding feature introduced in BLE 5.1 provides new possibilities for indoor positioning, while the LE Audio feature added in 5.2 will revolutionize the connection methods of traditional audio devices. In contrast, the evolution of Zigbee standards is relatively slow. In the AIoT era, BLE, with its low power consumption and low cost characteristics, is more easily integrated with AI edge computing. Market analysis shows that by 2024, the proportion of newly launched AIoT smart home devices using BLE solutions has reached 65%, while Zigbee accounts for only 18%. ABI Research predicts that by 2029, the annual shipment of Bluetooth devices will reach 7.7 billion units, with single-mode low-power Bluetooth devices growing rapidly at a compound annual growth rate of 22%.
Synergistic Effects with Mobile Ecosystems: This cannot be ignored. The global annual shipment of smartphones exceeds 1.2 billion units, with each phone being a potential connection node for BLE devices. Smartphone manufacturers such as Apple, Huawei, and Xiaomi are continuously enhancing the deep integration of BLE functionality, with iOS’s HomeKit and Android’s Smart Home framework natively supporting BLE device management. In contrast, Zigbee devices require manufacturers to develop their own gateways and supporting software. Data shows that by 2024, the shipment of smartphones and tablets supporting BLE will reach 1.5 billion units, providing ready-made control centers for BLE smart homes.
Supply Chain Scale and Risk Resistance: The comparison is stark. In 2023, the global shipment of BLE chips reached 4.5 billion units, more than seven times that of Zigbee chips (600 million units). This scale effect not only brings cost advantages but also provides stronger supply chain flexibility and supply assurance capabilities. During the pandemic, BLE chips, widely used in medical devices, were classified as key protected products, with supply chain stability higher than that of Zigbee chips. For smart home manufacturers, adopting BLE technology means more stable production plans and more controllable inventory management.
Clear Future Evolution Roadmap: The Bluetooth Special Interest Group has planned a technology roadmap up to 2026, including higher throughput, lower power consumption, and stronger positioning capabilities, while the Zigbee Alliance’s technological evolution is relatively slow. Analysis agencies predict that by 2027, the share of BLE in smart home wireless protocols will increase from 45% in 2023 to 68%, while Zigbee’s share will decrease from 30% to about 15%. This long-term trend forces manufacturers to reassess their technology strategies and accelerate the migration to the BLE ecosystem.
Table: Comparison of Industry Ecosystem Data between BLE and Zigbee
| Industry Dimension | Current Status of BLE Ecosystem | Current Status of Zigbee Ecosystem | Comparison of Differences |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Chip Suppliers | 20+ mainstream suppliers | 5-8 major suppliers | More choices with BLE |
| 2023 Chip Shipment Volume | 4.5 billion units | 600 million units | 7 times more for BLE |
| Average Module Price | $0.8-1.2 | $1.5-2.0 | 40% lower for BLE |
| Number of Open Source Projects | 4200+ | 1000+ | 4 times more for BLE |
| Size of Developer Community | 280,000+ | 70,000+ | 4 times larger for BLE |
| Speed of Technological Evolution | Annual updates | 2-3 year updates | Faster for BLE |
| Expected Share in 2027 | 68% | 15% | Widening gap |
| Smartphone Synergy | 1.5 billion units/year | Requires dedicated gateways | BLE advantages |
Transformation Challenges and Balancing Strategies: A Rational View of Technological Replacement
Despite the comprehensive advantages of BLE technology in the smart home field, fully replacing Zigbee still faces some technical and market challenges. Rationally analyzing these challenges can help manufacturers formulate more balanced technology strategies for a smooth transition.
Balancing Power Consumption and Network Scale is the primary technical challenge. The “flooding broadcast” mechanism of BLE Mesh may result in edge node power consumption being 20-30% higher than Zigbee when the number of devices exceeds 50. To address this issue, the industry has developed a “hybrid networking” solution, using BLE Mesh for the backbone network and star connections for end devices. Test data shows that this hybrid architecture can reduce power consumption in large-scale networks by 35% while maintaining coverage. The “low-power broadcast” feature introduced in Bluetooth 5.0 can reduce broadcast power consumption by 30%, partially alleviating this issue.
Real-Time Requirements still need optimization. Zigbee’s deterministic time slot allocation mechanism still has advantages in scenarios requiring high real-time performance, such as industrial control, with end-to-end latency controllable within 20ms. In contrast, BLE may experience delays of 50-100ms during multi-hop transmission. For critical applications such as security alarms in smart homes, the industry solution is to adopt a BLE + Sub-1G dual-mode solution, utilizing the Sub-1G frequency band to transmit alarm signals, ensuring real-time reliability. Actual tests show that this solution can control the transmission delay of critical signals to under 15ms, outperforming pure Zigbee solutions.
Compatibility of Existing Devices is a market reality issue. Manufacturers that invested early in the Zigbee ecosystem face the challenge of how to integrate existing devices into the new BLE system. There are three mainstream solutions on the market: dual-mode gateways (supporting both Zigbee and BLE), bridging devices, and gradual phasing-out strategies. Cost analysis shows that the dual-mode gateway solution has a higher initial investment (approximately 100 yuan per gateway) but maximizes the protection of users’ existing investments; while the gradual phasing-out strategy, although lower in cost, may lead to user attrition. Industry data indicates that leading manufacturers like Xiaomi adopt a “new BLE + old product maintenance” strategy, with Zigbee device support periods typically lasting 3-5 years to achieve a natural transition.
Cross-Brand Interconnectivity still faces challenges. Although the BLE standard is unified, differences in mesh implementation details, encryption methods, and data formats among manufacturers result in an interconnectivity success rate of about 85% for devices from different brands. To address this issue, the Bluetooth Special Interest Group is promoting “Bluetooth Mesh Standardization Certification,” requiring devices to pass strict interoperability tests. At the same time, the “BLE Smart Home Alliance” established by leading manufacturers has formulated a unified application layer protocol, increasing the interconnectivity success rate for basic categories such as lighting and switches to 95%. It is expected that by 2026, mainstream platforms will achieve over 90% interoperability of BLE devices.
Security Mechanisms need continuous strengthening. Although BLE provides AES-128 encryption, in actual deployment, about 25% of low-cost devices use simplified pairing processes, posing security risks. The industry best practice is to adopt a multi-layer protection system of “secure bootloader + over-the-air encryption upgrades + regular key rotation.” Security tests show that BLE devices that fully comply with security specifications can withstand 99.6% of common attacks, comparable to Zigbee. The “enhanced attribute encryption” of Bluetooth 5.2 further strengthens data transmission security, enabling BLE to meet financial-grade application requirements.
Vendor Transformation Strategies should be differentiated. Large manufacturers like Xiaomi and Huawei are establishing their own BLE ecosystems, optimizing experiences through vertical integration; medium-sized manufacturers choose mature BLE solution suppliers, focusing on functional differentiation; while small manufacturers quickly access platforms like Tmall Genie and Google Home. Market data shows that small manufacturers adopting platform access strategies can shorten product launch cycles to 4 weeks, reducing R&D costs by 60%. Professional institutions recommend that new smart home products, unless there are special requirements, should prioritize BLE solutions, while Zigbee should only be retained for specific high-reliability industrial control scenarios.
Table: Comparison of Challenges and Solutions for BLE in Smart Home Applications
| Challenge Type | Specific Manifestation | Industry Solutions | Effect Data |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption in Large-Scale Networking | 20-30% higher power consumption at 50 nodes | Hybrid networking topology optimization | Power consumption reduced by 35% |
| Real-Time Requirements | Multi-hop delay of 50-100ms | BLE + Sub-1G dual-mode | Critical signal <15ms |
| Existing Compatibility | Support for old Zigbee devices | Dual-mode gateway transition | 3-5 year transition period |
| Cross-Brand Interconnectivity | 85% interconnectivity success rate | Industry alliance standardization | Increased to 95% |
| Security Enhancement | 25% of devices use simplified pairing | Multi-layer protection system | Withstands 99.6% of attacks |
| Development Complexity | Mesh protocol is relatively complex | Provide SDK to simplify development | Launch cycle shortened by 40% |
| Cost Control | Security modules increase costs | Tiered security strategy | Cost optimized by 30% |
| Ecosystem Migration | Developer skill transition | Training and certification system | Certified engineers increased by 200% |
Future Outlook: BLE Leading Smart Homes into an Inclusive Era
The transition of wireless technology in smart homes from Zigbee to BLE reflects a profound change in the entire industry, moving from specialization to consumerization, from single product intelligence to whole-home intelligence, and from technology-driven to experience-driven. Based on current technological evolution and market data, this trend will continue to deepen over the next 5-10 years, driving the smart home market into a truly inclusive and widespread phase.
Technological Integration and Innovative Breakthroughs will continue to drive the evolution of BLE. BLE technology is absorbing the advantages of other wireless protocols to form more powerful integrated solutions. The centimeter-level indoor positioning enabled by BLE 5.1 gives BLE devices spatial awareness; LE Audio supports multi-device audio synchronization, making distributed audio systems possible. Industry forecasts suggest that the next generation of BLE technology will integrate UWB’s ultra-precise positioning and Wi-Fi’s high throughput characteristics, creating a “one network, multiple capabilities” integrated network. At the same time, the proliferation of AI edge computing will enable BLE terminal devices to have local decision-making capabilities, reducing reliance on the cloud. ABI Research predicts that by 2029, the shipment of BLE devices with AI edge computing capabilities will reach 2.5 billion units, accounting for 32% of all BLE devices.
Market Penetration and Restructuring will accelerate industry reshuffling. As the cost of BLE solutions continues to decline, the prices of smart home products are approaching those of traditional appliances. Data shows that the price of BLE smart switch modules has dropped from 2.5 in 2020 to 0.8 in 2025, a decrease of 68%. This cost optimization is driving rapid increases in market penetration, with global smart home device annual shipments expected to grow from 120 million units in 2023 to 350 million units by 2027, with BLE-based devices accounting for over 70%. This growth will not only come from the high-end market in first-tier cities but will also stem from ordinary households in second and third-tier cities. Market data indicates that the penetration rate of smart homes in second and third-tier cities is expected to grow by 85% year-on-year in 2024, far exceeding the 35% growth in first-tier cities.
Diverse Application Scenarios and Business Models will emerge. The popularization of BLE technology is giving rise to new smart home application scenarios, such as automatic scene modes based on location awareness and personalized services combined with biometric recognition. In terms of business models, the multi-faceted profit model of “hardware sales + data services + value-added applications” is gradually maturing. For example, smart refrigerators can monitor food storage conditions through BLE sensors, providing basic functions such as expiration reminders while also connecting to fresh food e-commerce platforms for one-click restocking. Industry reports indicate that the service revenue share of manufacturers adopting this model has increased from 15% in 2022 to 35% in 2025, with gross margins improving by 20 percentage points.
Standardization and Industry Collaboration will eliminate the final barriers. The Bluetooth Special Interest Group is collaborating with major manufacturers to establish “smart home BLE application specifications,” standardizing the processes for device discovery, pairing, control, and data exchange. At the same time, cross-platform interoperability is also being advanced, with platforms like Apple HomeKit, Google Home, and Alibaba Cloud IoT implementing cross-platform management of BLE devices through unified standards like “Matter.” Market feedback shows that standardization has reduced consumer decision-making time by 40%, and the return rate due to compatibility issues has dropped from 12% to 4%. It is expected that by 2026, mainstream platforms will achieve over 90% interoperability of BLE devices, completely eliminating user concerns.
User Experience and Interaction Revolution will redefine smart homes. The evolution of BLE technology is changing the way people interact with their home environments, with new interaction modes such as voice control, gesture recognition, and situational awareness gradually replacing traditional mobile app operations. The streaming function of hearing aids supported by LE Audio provides an accessible experience for people with hearing impairments, reflecting technological inclusivity. User experience data shows that BLE smart home systems with natural interactions have a user satisfaction rating of 4.7/5, 0.8 points higher than traditional systems; daily interaction frequency has increased from 15 times to 28 times. This upgrade in experience is a key turning point in transforming smart homes from “nice to have” to “must-have.”
Market Data Predictions confirm the transformation trend. Comprehensive data from multiple agencies indicates that the share of BLE in smart home wireless protocols will increase from 45% in 2023 to 68% in 2027, while Zigbee’s share will decrease from 30% to 15%. By 2029, the annual shipment of Bluetooth devices will reach 7.7 billion units, with single-mode low-power Bluetooth devices growing at a compound annual growth rate of 22%. In terms of the chip market, BLE chip sales are expected to grow from $3.039 billion in 2023 to $5.839 billion in 2030, with a compound annual growth rate of 9.1%, while the growth rate of the Zigbee chip market is only 5-6%. These data clearly indicate that BLE will become the dominant technology for wireless connections in smart homes, driving the industry into a new phase of inclusive popularization.
Follow our WeChat public account and reply “lock standard” to obtain related standard document downloads:
Shared materials are sourced from the internet, infringement will be deleted.Historical articles
Analyze business models, and this diagram must be drawn.
Digitalization series article collection
Business model article collection
Product manager tool collection
Industry report collection
User experience and pain point analysis tool: Customer Journey Mapping (CJM)
Demand priority analysis tool: KANO model
Strategic analysis tool: Porter’s Five Forces Model
Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) uses, characteristics, classifications, and programming
Quality standards and specifications for smart locks (1) lock cylinder quality requirements and standards, what does C-level lock cylinder mean, and what kind of lock cylinder qualifies as a C-level lock cylinder.