I remember when I first started in the industry, I took over a PLC program left by a former colleague, and it was a complete mess! There were no comments, variable names were arbitrary, and the program structure was chaotic. It took me three whole days to understand this program. This is why today I want to talk to you about the standardization of PLC ladder diagram programming. Good programming habits not only make your own code easier to maintain but also greatly improve team collaboration efficiency.
Standardization of ladder diagrams, simply put, is about organizing your PLC program according to certain rules, giving it a clear structure and a unified style. It’s like organizing your toolbox, where each tool has a fixed position, and you can find it easily when needed. Standardized programming is not meant to limit creativity but to make your program easier to understand and maintain. Imagine if every electrician wired things their own way without following any standards; how troublesome would it be during maintenance! The same goes for PLC programs, especially in industrial settings, where a system often needs to be maintained by multiple people for decades. A non-standardized program is like a maze without a map; every maintenance task becomes an adventure.
1
Core Standards
First is the naming convention. Variable names should clearly express their purpose, just like naming your children. For example, input points can start with “I_” and output points with “Q_”; for instance, “I_StartButton” indicates the input for the start button. Avoid using meaningless names like “X1” or “Y2”; it’s as vague as calling a friend “that guy”.
Next is the commenting standard. Good comments act like a tour guide, helping others understand your program’s logic. Each functional block should have a comment explaining its purpose, and complex logic should be explained in detail. But remember, more comments are not always better; the key is to provide effective information, just like the key steps in a recipe.
Finally, there is the modular structure. A good PLC program should be like LEGO blocks, composed of multiple small modules with clear functions. For example, separate the start sequence, run control, and alarm handling into different modules. This way, when a part needs modification, you only need to focus on the relevant module without touching the entire program.
2
Best Practices
In practice, I have found that the most effective approach is to design the program framework first and then fill in the details. It’s like laying the foundation before building a house. A good framework typically includes the main control loop, device initialization, various functional modules, alarm handling, and human-machine interface interactions.
When writing ladder diagrams, maintain a logical flow from left to right and top to bottom, making the program flow as naturally as telling a story. Complex conditional judgments can adopt a multi-tier structure instead of cramming all conditions into one line, which improves readability, just like writing paragraphs in an article.
Additionally, create a unified documentation template to record program versions, modification history, and functional descriptions, which is crucial for later maintenance. I once wasted valuable time understanding program logic during an emergency fault handling due to a lack of documentation, which could have been avoided.
3
Practical Application Cases
For example, in a simple conveyor belt control. A standardized ladder diagram should look like this:
First is the main control network, which includes start, stop, and emergency stop logic, clearly labeling each input point’s actual corresponding item (e.g., “I_StartPB” corresponds to “Start Button”). Then comes the conveyor belt operation control network, grouping the conditions for starting the conveyor belt, operational status, and protection logic. Finally, there is the fault handling network, which uniformly manages various alarm signals.
Each network has a concise comment at the top explaining its function and logic, such as “Conveyor Belt Start Control – Starts when safety conditions are met and the start button is pressed”. Complex logic is accompanied by detailed explanations, such as “Delay for 5 seconds to ensure system stability before allowing the next operation”.
This program structure is clear, allowing maintenance personnel to quickly understand and modify it even years later.
4
Common Issues and Solutions
A common mistake for beginners is to overly rely on physical addresses instead of symbolic names. For example, using “X0” directly instead of a meaningful name like “I_EmergencyStop”. The solution is to establish a unified naming rule for the team and strictly enforce it.
Another issue is a scattered program structure, where functionally related logic is dispersed in different locations. The solution is to first sketch the program framework on paper, determine the functions of each module, and then start programming. This is as effective as outlining a paper before writing it.
5
Precautions
As a special reminder, when modifying a running program, always back up the original version first and add clear comments at the modification points explaining the changes, reasons, and dates. This is as important as hospital medical records. The initial values of variables also need special attention; incorrect initial values may lead to unexpected device startups. After every program change, comprehensive testing is required, especially for safety-related functions.
By mastering standardized ladder diagram programming, your PLC programs will be clearer and more reliable. It is recommended to start practicing with small projects and gradually form your own standardized system. Next, you can explore how to apply these standards to function blocks and structured text programming.
