Differences Between RK3576 and RK3588

Follow+Star Public Number, don’t miss wonderful content
Differences Between RK3576 and RK3588
Source | 米尔MYiR
Rockchip is considered a good chip manufacturer in China, and it has developed well over the years.
Recently, I shared an article titled “Domestic High-Performance RK3576 Empowering AIoT“, and some friends found that there is a higher performance RK3588.
Today, let’s talk about the differences between Rockchip RK3576 and RK3588.

Differences Between RK3576 and RK3588

Strong CPU Performance, Rich Application Scenarios

CPU Performance: RK3588 uses a quad-core Cortex – A76 + quad-core Cortex – A55, while RK3576 uses a quad-core Cortex – A72 + quad-core Cortex – A53 architecture for cost considerations, and is equipped with an ARM Cortex M0 coprocessor, providing more possibilities for related applications.

Differences Between RK3576 and RK3588

GPU Performance: RK3576 uses ARM Mali G52 MC3, while RK3588 is equipped with ARM Mali – G610MC4. Both support OpenGL ES 1.1, 2.0, and 3.2, Vulkan 1.2, and while both support similar graphics standards, RK3588 has a higher OpenCL version (2.2 vs 2.1).

Differences Between RK3576 and RK3588

NPU Performance: Both are equipped with 6 Tops of computing power and support int4/int8/int16/FP16/BF16/TF32 and other data formats, adapting to diverse AI application scenarios.

Differences Between RK3576 and RK3588

Memory and Storage

RK3576 supports 32-bit LPDDR4/LPDDR4X/LPDDR5, while supporting eMMC5.1, SDIO3.0 and SFC as well as UFS v2.0,

RK3588 supports 64-bit LPDDR4/LPDDR4x/LPDDR5, supports eMMC5.1; paired with HS400, SDIO3.0 paired with HS200, and supports NMe and SFC. The two differ in memory data width (64bit vs 32bit), with RK3588 having an advantage in data transfer.

Differences Between RK3576 and RK3588

Superb Video Encoding and Decoding Capabilities

The encoding capability of RK3588 supports up to 8K@30fps H.264/H.265, while RK3576 supports up to 4K@60fps H.264/H.265. The decoding capability of RK3588 supports up to 8K@60fps H.265, while RK3576 supports up to 8K@30fps. Both have strong video encoding and decoding capabilities, with RK3588 excelling in 8K video encoding and decoding.

Differences Between RK3576 and RK3588

Supports Multi-Screen Display

Both support multi-screen display and various common display interfaces.RK3576 supports up to 3 screens (4K@120 + 2.5K@60 + 2K@60), featuring HDMI v2.1/ eDP v1.3 combo interface, MIPI DSI 4 channels, DP v1.4, and USB 3.0 combo (Type – C) interfaces.

RK3588 supports up to 7 screens and supports 8K, with dual HDMI2.1/eDP V1.4 combo interfaces, dual MIPI – DSI TX 4 channels, and dual DP v1.3 embedded USB 3.1 with audio and HDCP2.x.

Differences Between RK3576 and RK3588

Camera Video Input Comparison

RK3576 supports up to 16MPixel ISP with HDR and 3DNR

RK3588 is equipped with 48M Pixel ISP with HDR and 3DNR, with RK3588 having a higher pixel ISP resolution (48M vs 16M)

Differences Between RK3576 and RK3588

Rich Interface Configuration

Both are equipped with rich interface configurations, PCIe/ SATA/ TYPE C/ USB3.0/ USB2.0/ dual Ethernet ports/ multiple serial ports, meeting different product application needs.

Differences Between RK3576 and RK3588

Summary: Cost-Effective RK3576

In terms of overall performance, RK3588 has stronger CPU performance, and for strong AI needs, RK3588 is recommended; however, RK3576, as Rockchip’s latest high-performance SOC, can be considered extremely cost-effective, achieving 70% of RK3588’s performance at 30% of the price, suitable for most AIOT, artificial intelligence, industrial applications, etc. RK3576, as another conscientious masterpiece from Rockchip, is your best choice.

———— END ————
Differences Between RK3576 and RK3588
●Column “Embedded Tools
●Column “Embedded Development”
●Column “Keil Tutorial”
●Selected Tutorials from Embedded Column
Follow the public account reply “Join Group” to join the technical exchange group according to the rules, reply “1024” to see more content.
Click “Read Original” to see more shares.

Leave a Comment