Advantages and Disadvantages of Mesh and AC+AP Networking

The advantages and disadvantages of Mesh networking and AC+AP networking are compared as follows:

Mesh Networking

  • Advantages
    • Easy Configuration
      Most manufacturers’ Mesh routers can be set up by simply pressing the WPS/Mesh button on the device or using a mobile app, making the process quick and easy. Some brands even support automatic wired Mesh networking, allowing non-professional users to easily get started. You can also purchase a Mesh kit that comes pre-configured from the factory, ready to use straight out of the box.
    • Flexible Networking
      Supports wired, wireless, and hybrid networking methods, allowing you to choose the appropriate networking method based on the actual situation of your home or location. It can also be set up wirelessly without relying heavily on network cables.
    • Strong Scalability
      Nodes can be added as needed to expand the network coverage area, meeting the needs of different spaces and layouts.
    • Good Stability
      Utilizes a multi-point interconnected mesh network structure, allowing network signals to be transmitted through multiple paths. When a node fails, data can automatically be transmitted through other paths, preventing the entire network from collapsing and providing a certain level of self-healing and redundancy.
    • Seamless Roaming Experience
      Wireless devices can automatically switch to the node with the strongest signal within the coverage area, achieving seamless transitions. This avoids the connection interruptions that traditional routers experience when switching nodes, ensuring stable network connections as mobile devices move through different areas.
  • Disadvantages
    • Limited Number of Nodes and Coverage Area
      The number of routers should not be too many; generally, a configuration of 3 routers is optimal for wireless Mesh networking. Too many nodes may lead to decreased network performance and stability. For larger areas or multi-story homes, or networks with many nodes, it may not fully meet the needs.
    • Device and Cable Space Consumption
      Mesh routers require connection to network cables and power lines, and the devices and cables cannot be hidden during installation, which may take up space and affect the aesthetic appeal of the home. Even if the routers are compact and visually appealing, the power and network cables still significantly impact aesthetics. The actual deployment location needs to prioritize power access and device placement.
    • Higher Cost
      Compared to traditional single routers, Mesh networking requires purchasing multiple Mesh routers, leading to relatively high hardware costs, especially for high-end Mesh routers, which can be quite expensive.
    • Wireless Transmission Limitations
      If wireless Mesh networking is adopted, it has a smaller bandwidth and higher latency compared to wired connections. Signal transmission may be obstructed by walls, electrical appliances, and other obstacles, affecting network speed and stability. Additionally, there may be co-channel interference between nodes, which could reduce the signal-to-noise ratio of the wireless network in specific areas.

AC+AP Networking

  • Advantages
    • Comprehensive and Stable Network Coverage
      Installing an AP in each room can achieve full coverage without dead spots. Originating from enterprise-level applications, AC+AP has undergone long-term commercial testing, ensuring the long-term stability of home networks and excellent roaming experiences. Whether moving across a flat or up and down stairs, there will be no lag or disconnection issues.
    • Good Aesthetics
      Panel APs are small in size and can be installed on walls, integrating with the wall sockets in your home without taking up space. This is especially suitable for bedrooms and other areas where aesthetics are important; the AC router can be placed in a weak current box, also saving space and not affecting aesthetics.
    • Easy Management and Maintenance
      The AC can centrally manage and control multiple APs. Through a single management interface, administrators can easily configure, monitor, and maintain the entire wireless network. When issues arise, they can quickly locate fault points and perform remote diagnostics and repairs, greatly improving management efficiency. Since AC+AP is mostly based on a wired tree topology, its logical structure is clearer and simpler compared to the Mesh networking approach.
    • Intelligent Load Balancing
      The AC can automatically assign clients to less loaded APs based on the load conditions of each AP, ensuring that every client receives optimal network performance and avoiding network congestion and performance degradation due to overloading of a specific AP.
    • Good Scalability
      The number of APs can be increased according to actual needs to expand network coverage, meeting the growing user demands. For example, one AC router can manage up to 32 wireless APs, making it suitable for villas and other large areas needing wireless coverage.
  • Disadvantages
    • High Cable Requirements
      Requires prior planning and construction during renovations, with network cables and 86-box information panels pre-buried. If network cables are not laid or if their quality is poor, installation cannot proceed, making deployment difficult for already renovated homes.
    • Higher Costs
      The equipment itself is costly, and installation and debugging usually require professionals, increasing both installation and debugging costs, resulting in a relatively high overall cost.
    • Complex Debugging
      Requires professionals for debugging and configuration to ensure the coordinated operation of APs and optimization of network performance. Improper debugging may affect network stability and coverage effectiveness.
    • Relatively Poor Flexibility
      Once installation and configuration are completed, making significant changes or expansions to the network later may be limited by the existing wiring, making it less flexible and convenient than Mesh networking.

Leave a Comment