Comparison of Common Compression and Decompression Tools in Linux

Last week, I mainly wrote an article on common file compression and decompression commands. If needed, you can look up the historical articles.

This article mainly summarizes a comparison of the following 10 commonly used compression/decompression commands, covering core features, applicable scenarios, and performance differences to help you quickly choose the best tool!

1. Core Features Comparison Table

Command Format Compression Algorithm Compression Ratio Speed Cross-Platform Features
<span>tar</span> .tar None (only archiving) Fast High Requires other tools for compression
<span>gzip</span> .gz DEFLATE Low Fast High Fast speed, low resource usage
<span>gunzip</span> .gz Fast High <span>gzip</span>‘s decompression tool
<span>bzip2</span> .bz2 Burrows-Wheeler Medium Medium High Balances compression ratio and speed
<span>bunzip2</span> .bz2 Medium High <span>bzip2</span>‘s decompression tool
<span>xz</span> .xz LZMA2 High Slow High Highest compression ratio, but slow and high memory usage
<span>unxz</span> .xz Slow High <span>xz</span>‘s decompression tool
<span>zip</span> .zip DEFLATE Low Fast Very High Preferred for cross-platform, supports encryption/volumes
<span>unzip</span> .zip Fast Very High <span>zip</span>‘s decompression tool
<span>7z</span> .7z LZMA2 Very High Very Slow Medium Compression ratio champion, supports multiple formats/encryption

2. Performance and Scenario Recommendations

Compression Ratio Priority (High → Low)

  1. <span>xz</span> / <span>7z</span> (LZMA2 algorithm)
  2. <span>bzip2</span>
  3. <span>gzip</span> / <span>zip</span>

Speed Priority (Fast → Slow)

  1. <span>gzip</span> / <span>zip</span>
  2. <span>bzip2</span>
  3. <span>xz</span> / <span>7z</span>

Scenario Recommendations

  • Fast Compression/Decompression: <span>gzip</span> (.gz) or <span>zip</span> (cross-platform compatible)
  • High Compression Ratio Requirement: <span>xz</span> (.xz) or <span>7z</span> (.7z)
  • Balance Compression Ratio and Speed: <span>bzip2</span> (.bz2)
  • Archiving Multiple Files: <span>tar + Compression Tool</span> (e.g., <span>tar -czf</span> → .tar.gz)
  • Encryption/Volume Transfer: <span>zip</span> or <span>7z</span>

3. Key Differences Explained

<span>tar</span> vs Other Tools

  • <span>tar</span> only archives without compression, requires a compression tool (e.g., <span>tar -zcvf</span> = <span>gzip</span> compression, generating .tar.gz).
  • Other tools (e.g., <span>zip</span>/<span>7z</span>) support both packaging and compression, no extra steps required.

<span>xz</span> vs <span>7z</span>

  • <span>xz</span> focuses on a single format (.xz), with a compression ratio close to <span>7z</span>, but simpler functionality.
  • <span>7z</span> supports multiple formats (.7z, .zip, .tar, etc.), providing advanced features like encryption, volumes, and self-extraction.

<span>zip</span> vs <span>gzip</span>

  • <span>zip</span> has the best cross-platform compatibility (default support in Windows), supports directory compression.
  • <span>gzip</span> is often used with<span>tar</span> (generating .tar.gz), suitable for Linux environments.

4. Common Combination Command Examples

# 1. Package and compress to .tar.gz
 tar -czvf archive.tar.gz /path/to/dir

# 2. Decompress .tar.xz
 tar -xJvf archive.tar.xz

# 3. Encrypt and compress to .zip
 zip -e secret.zip file.txt

# 4. Maximum compression to .7z
 7z a -t7z -m0=lzma2 -mx=9 -mhe=on archive.7z /data

5. Summary

  • Daily Fast Compression<span>gzip</span> or <span>zip</span>
  • Server Log Compression<span>xz</span> (saves storage)
  • Cross-Platform Sharing<span>zip</span>
  • Sensitive Data Encryption<span>7z</span> or <span>zip -e</span>
  • Handling Very Large Files<span>tar + xz</span> (volumes optional)

Mastering the features of these tools will help you easily meet various file storage and transfer needs! 🚀

Leave a Comment