Intel’s NUC product line now has three types, in addition to the regular compact “Pro/Performance” line, the Enthusiast product line has been added, which started with The King Raja’s “Beast Canyon” (PS: actually began with the Skull Canyon from 6770HQ, but that graphics card was not strong enough, it was more of a trial product). It has been racing down the path of performance machines. By the NUC9 generation, the real mini powerhouse NUC9 Extreme series was launched, featuring a large box shape, an additional graphics card slot, and extra power supply, capable of supporting dual-slot graphics cards up to 20cm long. The CPU innovatively uses a computing board design, with integration that surpasses various small hosts—however, at this time, graphics card power consumption has begun to skyrocket, and there are very few graphics cards that can fit into the NUC9. Intel even specially collaborated with ASUS to create a DUAL MINI official card, but the highest it could support was only the 2070…
Thus, this year’s brand new NUC11 Extreme has significantly improved graphics card compatibility, upgraded power specifications, and the CPU platform has entirely switched to the TigerLake-H based 11900KB/11700KB, becoming the only “quasi” desktop 10nm platform, known as Beast Canyon, with a volume of only 8 liters, still a truly powerful mini PC with unmatched design!Unboxing~~~Due to an increase in size, the packaging for this NUC11 is much larger, a rectangular box measuring about 45X26X21, but still features the high-end black background with gold lettering, along with the noble i9 branding. The internal slogan “Engineered to Win” and skull logo give it unbeatable quality!The appearance of Beast Canyon resembles a Thunderbolt graphics card box that was quite common a few years ago, measuring just over 35cm. With a 650W SFX power supply, CPU, motherboard, and cooling inside, it weighs quite a bit, almost fully packed. The front features an RGB logo panel, and below are two USB-A ports, an SD card reader, and a headphone jack. The back has IO ports and power, while the bottom hides an M2 interface (PCIE 4.0 X4, sharing bandwidth with the graphics card), with the other three sides being large metal mesh surfaces.Beast Canyon opens just as simply as before, unscrewing the four screws on the IO interface side allows you to pull out the left and right side panels and lift the top panel. Under the top panel are three cool 8025 fans, providing airflow by exhausting air outwards.The internal structure is similar to the NUC9, with a PCIE sub-board on which the NUC’s core computing sub-board is inserted, dual-slot design, and the appearance size looks completely identical to the NUC9’s computing board, theoretically upgradeable. Next to it is a 650W SFX fully modular gold power supply from FSP, which is a bit tight for the current graphics cards, but fortunately, the 11900KB’s power consumption is not too high.Compared to the tight airflow situation of the NUC9’s computing board, the NUC11 this time has specially created an airflow channel for the computing board, greatly alleviating CPU cooling when using a discrete graphics card. Of course, if you don’t use a discrete graphics card, you can remove it, which then provides an additional PCIE 4X interface.So in fact, the NUC11 has three expansion slots, two slots reserved for graphics cards, and one slot is for PCIE 4X 3.0, clearly reserved for super SSDs like the 900P AIC or network cards like the X550T2.The computing card is marked with a golden font indicating the model, exclusive to i9, upping the quality!The airflow cover is quite simple, using a PCI bracket for fixing.By unscrewing the screws on the top of the computing card, you can remove the cover and fan of the computing card. Unlike the NUC9, the NUC11’s card is somewhat difficult to disassemble, but this method of directly lifting it is more convenient for installation.Inside, there are a total of 3+1 M2 slots, the short M2 has been pre-installed with the AX210 WIFI6E wireless card, the two M2 2280 on the left come from the PCH, each providing PCIE 3.0 X4 bandwidth, and the one on the right comes from the CPU’s PCIE 4.0 X4, which is the main M2. Next to it are two SODIMM slots, but this time they have been changed to vertical insertion.The CPU’s cooling module is quite small, using two heat pipes to transfer heat to the pure copper fins above, and then using a turbine fan to blow it out. The top’s 8025 exhausts it out, and the efficiency is better than expected, but there are still some bottlenecks. However, the actual test shows a very small impact on performance.The power supply is from FSP650-57SAB-A, SFX fully modular gold, slightly small, as there are now SFX power supplies with a maximum of 750W.Fortunately, the modular cables are quite generous, with a 90-degree PCIE 8P and a dual-head PCIE 6+2, fully accommodating dual 8PIN graphics cards without issue.Due to the dual restrictions of the CPU airflow cover and SFX power supply thickness, the NUC11 can only support dual-slot thickness graphics cards, anything more is not feasible. In terms of length, it still supports up to about 30cm, and shoulder PCB is not a big issue, but thickness essentially eliminates 90% of high-end graphics cards, especially various non-reference versions. After various comparisons and searches, the conclusion is that the strongest graphics card that can fit into the NUC11 Extreme is the old yellow’s 3080TI FE. Since this card is almost nonexistent in China, the slightly better options available are Su Ma’s RX6800 and RX6700XT reference cards, and both of these cards’ power consumption is also quite suitable for the 650W power supply. If you stuff a 3080TI in there, this power supply may not be able to handle it… Of course, for those with deep pockets, they can also go for the A6000, which fits in without any issues… Previously, old yellow slashed the OTES’s designation for dual-slot 3080 and 3090, it’s quite infuriating.There is also a dedicated cover on the PCIE bracket to secure the graphics card and computing card, but it is not screw-less.You can see that there is also a WIFI antenna here, with another on the top panel.This time, the interface has also been upgraded, with dual Thunderbolt 4 ports + 2.5G network card, 6 USB3.1 (10Gbps), but unfortunately, the network card has become a single card, which will disappoint soft routing enthusiasts…This time, the NUC11E’s lighting effects have been greatly enhanced, with RGB not only on the front skull but also around the front IO interface and the base. Unfortunately, it seems to be a single-color version of 12V RGB, unlike the addressable RGB available in DIY setups that can achieve colorful effects~ However, in the NUC, this is the prettiest version so far, and the single-color RGB effect is also quite good!Testing~In terms of performance, this mysterious 11900KB is actually the 11900H from the notebook platform, with a maximum frequency of 4.9GHz and a TDP of 65W. The 10nm SuperFin process theoretically makes it stronger than the desktop 11th generation RocketLake, with a significantly larger cache. The single-core theoretical performance is between the 11900K and 11700K, while multi-core performance is limited by the power and temperature walls. If the fans are manually set to full speed, it would be slightly better, but at the cost of significant noise. The actual gaming performance benefits from the 24M L3, theoretically outperforming RKLS (though it suffers from memory frequency issues), this is the real 11th generation desktop Core!The directly connected PCIE 4.0 M2 interface performs well. If swapped to the M2 on the bottom that shares bandwidth with the graphics card, it could further enhance performance.The PCIE slot is full-blooded 4.0 16X, and the graphics card’s performance is well utilized. The NUC11’s design of having airflow from all sides plus upward exhaust for the graphics dock is very friendly for graphics card cooling. Plus, the RX6800 reference card’s power consumption is not high, with the highest temperature during testing just over 70 degrees, better than the cooling performance of a bare machine.Unfortunately, the 11900KB, while a desktop platform, still retains the TGL-H core, with a memory frequency limit of a meager 2933 which is not adjustable. The pair of G.Skill 3200C18 16G I have, while better in latency under XMP than JEDEC’s C22, the NUC11 Extreme’s BIOS does provide memory XMP functionality, but all the small parameters can only be viewed and not adjusted. There is also no Gear setting, leading to either running at 3200 Gear2 or 2400 Gear1, neither of which is optimal. The memory latency is very high, which is quite regrettable. Compared with the desktop platform RKLS 3466/3600 Gear1, the performance gap is significantly pulled back, and I hope Intel will open up memory parameters and frequency adjustment features soon. After all, the NUC9 could adjust these, and only then could the performance of this 11900KB be fully released.In terms of power consumption and temperature, the 11900KB’s power consumption entirely depends on temperature. In the default balanced cooling mode, it peaks at about 90W/fully loaded at 3.8G before hitting the 100-degree power wall, at which point it starts to throttle down, fluctuating around 65W/3.4-3.5G, with the CPU temperature around 90 degrees. However, noise control is very good, only about 50db, almost inaudible, except for the rolling heatwave emanating from the machine, it’s hard to realize there is a fully operational machine here.If you want to unlock all performance, you must change the fans to full speed in the BIOS or XTU software, which can push it to about 100W/fully loaded at around 4.1G. However, it will quickly hit the wall again, but the temperature will be a bit lower, stabilizing at around 84 degrees under full load (AVX512 off), with the frequency stabilizing at 3.5GHz. However, the cost is noise reaching 63db, which is more than ten times the sound pressure of 50db… It’s completely not worth it. I originally wanted to tweak the PL1 through XTU, but seeing the temperature at that state, I felt it wasn’t worth my time… Overall, the cooling system of the NUC11’s CPU is just sufficient for 65W, typical of OEM machines, not a bit more. To play with this rare desktop-grade overclockable TGL-H, one would probably have to resort to extreme modifications.ConclusionSo how does this second-generation Intel mini powerhouse perform? As an OEM machine, the design is quite excellent, full of stylish design elements. The NUC remains the strongest mini PC available; OEM manufacturers can sell it at a good price just by changing the casing. Compared to the previous generation, graphics card compatibility and cooling have significantly improved, but there are still some regrets. Overall, the playability is decent, but the most regrettable aspect is the price—the launch price of the 11900KB version is as high as 1200USD/8799RMB. No matter how you look at it, this price is too high. To know, the combination of 11900K + Z590i + A4 case + SFX power supply is only about 6000 yuan, and the smallest A4 case is also about 8L, with better cooling and graphics card compatibility. If it were switched to B560I, the price would drop significantly. Even if the NUC11’s design is exquisite, it can only lose out under the huge price gap… However, compared to the ridiculous 1500USD launch price of the NUC9 Extreme, it has dropped a bit, but clearly not enough. The upcoming i7 version should be a bit better, after all, this generation’s i7 11700B is also 8C, with a single-core frequency only 0.1GHz lower, and multi-core is naturally at 65W, so there isn’t much difference. However, the price is nearly 200USD lower, although still on the high side, it remains a toy for those with money, but it is indeed quite fun!